Editor,

How did the left convince so many people we face a climate catastrophe when climate change is at the bottom of the list of concerns for most UN nations? When did it become fashionable to accept temperature predictions 50 years from now? Just 10,000 years ago we had a 2-mile thick ice sheet over North America and only 200 years ago we came out of a Little Ice Age that had starved millions to death in Europe due to a lack of enough CO2 in the air to grow food. Those were real climate catastrophes.

Recommended for you

(7) comments

JustMike650

Lunacy. How do you even get by doing normal daily tasks? 💕🙌💕

Jorg

Would anyone who flunked math in 3rd grade go up against a mathematician discussing for example LaPlace transformations? Probably not. But when it comes to science, or basic logic, - even the most challenged thinks his opinion is worth its salt.

edkahl

Interesting how people who don't know the facts resort to ad hominem attacks.

Jorg

Or write about things they have absolutely no knowledge of!

Terence Y

Thank you, Mr. Kahl, for your letter. As usual, expect to be attacked by those who cannot explain how temperatures and carbon dioxide levels in the past were much higher than now, when automobiles and air conditioners didn’t exist. Unfortunately, we’ll get the usual willful ignorance of our past temperatures and the numerous Ice Ages we’ve encountered in our history, but never the opposite. You can lead some folks to knowledge and truth but you can’t force them to comprehend or accept it. Keep those letters coming.

Rel

98% of all scientists have agreed we are undergoing climate change. They have evidence of dramatic changes occurring from measurements of 200,000 years. Somehow, I can tender agreement over their learned findings over climate deniers of today.

Dirk van Ulden

Rel - please correct your assertion that 98% of all scientists agree? All scientists? No sir, only those who have subscribed to that garbage in, garbage out mathematical model. To be called a scientist in that group does not actually require one to be one. They can't even predict weather two weeks from now with any measure of accuracy, let alone 50 or 100 years. One does not have to be a denier to question the hype and the methodology. But, Rel, this is a free country and you can believe anything you want and so do I for that matter.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here