Eugene Whitlock

Eugene Whitlock

Despite signing a sizable settlement agreement seemingly severing his relationship with the San Mateo County Community College District, a former district employee claimed the deal does not jeopardize his candidacy in the Board of Trustees race.

Eugene Whitlock signed a $2.2 million payout settlement in 2019 when he departed as vice chancellor from the San Mateo County Community College District. After promptly landing a similar position at the University of California, Berkeley, Whitlock is back and running against fellow challenger Lisa Petrides to represent Area 1 on the school board.

While the signed agreement expressly states that he agrees to “have no further contact of any kind, whether direct or indirect, with the [San Mateo County Community College District] or its colleges, including taking any measures that would create any type of relationship with [the district], Whitlock contends those terms are unenforceable.

“There is nothing that can stop me from running for office,” said Whitlock, nodding to case law which he said further shields his campaign because voters cannot be denied the right to support their preferred candidate.

A 1991 decision in a lawsuit involving the Grossmont Union High School District and former employee Thomas Davies who signed a similar severance agreement and was later allowed by the court to run for the school board is precedent for his position, said Whitlock.

Whitlock declined to speak about the agreement with the district. But he did acknowledge that he cooperated with the investigation of the county District Attorney’s Office into former district chancellor Ron Galatolo.

Meanwhile, district spokesman Richard Rojo said community college district officials hold a different position on Whitlock’s candidacy.

“The board of trustees for the college district unanimously decided to terminate Mr. Whitlock’s employment in April of 2019. Months before he announced his candidacy, we entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Whitlock in May of 2020 to avoid the distractions and considerable expense of protracted litigation,” he said in an email. “The college district expects all contracting parties, including Mr. Whitlock, to honor their agreements with the district.”

Mark Church, assessor-county clerk-recorder and chief elections officer, said Whitlock is a qualified candidate according to the narrow set of standards considered by his office.

“Mr. Whitlock signed the declaration of candidacy stating that he has met the necessary statutory qualifications for this office. Upon review, we have determined that he has indeed satisfied the statutory qualifications for this office and is eligible to run,” he said in an email, which notes the office has neither seen the settlement nor would it have affected the filing judgment.

Furthermore, Church deferred to whether the settlement would affect Whitlock’s ability to serve the board.

For her part, Petrides wondered whether terms of the agreement would impair Whitlock’s service to the district, if elected.

“It does appear not being able to participate in any campus activity would be an impediment to him serving as part of the governing board,” she said.

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

Note to readers: this article has been amended to note that Whitlock did not comment about the agreement signed with the district.

Recommended for you

(5) comments


Eugene Whitlock is very bright, has a law degree, and was SMCCCD General Counsel. All those folks questioning whether he can set foot on campus and such, if Mr. Whitlock says it's unenforceable, I believe him. He knows his stuff.

Michael B. Reiner, PhD

I am not an attorney, so maybe someone can clarify:

If I work for a corporation and get fired as a whistleblower, but arrange a settlement for money and an agreement to keep silent and not to step foot in the building, that is a legitimate contract. Courts have stated that private corporations have a vested interest in maintaining its brand and to minimize bad publicity by having both parties enter into a "non-disclosure agreement."

Does the same rationale apply to the government? The community college district is a government agency. Who is being protected by silencing a whistleblower with "hush money?" Is the Board of Trustees protecting the "brand" of SMCCCD from bad publicity or are they silencing criticism? Have the citizens of San Mateo given the trustees the power to use taxpayers' money to silence dissent? Can the government use taxpayer dollars to prevent whistleblower findings from reaching the public by paying someone off in a settlement? 

Even if the whistleblower accepts the payoff, are the citizen's First Amendment Rights to criticize the government superseded by a contract? 

Similarly, can the government prevent someone from running for office with a contract to stay away? I am not a Constitutional lawyer, but that sounds like a violation of basic citizen's rights (as opposed to private industry) and would be non-enforceable.

If Trump gives Biden $500M not to run and Biden puts his John Hancock to paper, is that contract enforceable?

Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College District.  LinkedIn:

Christopher Conway

Nobody in their right mind would vote for this guy. Get out and stay out.

John Baker

Part of being a school/college board member is participating in school events and bridging gaps between students, staff, and faculty. I can’t imagine being effective without being able to do those things and actually agree with Chris Conway on this one.

Michael B. Reiner, PhD

If one believes this, please ask the Board how it created the job of chancellor emeritus for Mr. Galatolo to implement and administer the CSU-Canada program when he too was banned from placing a foot on campus? Logical consistency is not the Board’s forte!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!