Some athletic directors are open to collective bargaining agreements for college athletes

Meanwhile, a group of state attorneys general are urging their schools not to sign an agreement sent out by the newly created College Sports Commission that would set the guidelines for new rules to pay players.

Against all that, a few ADs see collective bargaining as something that could be inevitable, even if it would take some creativity to make it work without crushing the finances of their sports programs.

“Look, I think we have to give our athletes a bigger voice in all of this,” Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork said. “It's really complicated. You have state law. You have private universities and public universities. These students are not employees. They're student-athletes, so employment compensation, you set that aside.

“Structurally, it's really, really complicated. No one has come up with the panacea. Everybody's got all these proposals. It's not that straightforward.”

The idea of a CBA would have been unthinkable not long ago, but so was name, image and likeness and what is essentially free agency through the transfer portal.

Athletes.org, a players association for college athletes, offered a 38-page proposal of what a CBA could look like. The group argued that a CBA would create uniform standards, decrease the risk of litigation and offer legal protections for athletes not covered under current rules.

The NCAA and others have argued that if athletes are considered employees, it could result in schools having to take on costs such insurance and retirement contributions as well as regulations they can’t afford. That could mean universities cutting some Olympic sports to help financially make up the difference.

Joe Castiglione, who is in his 28th year as Oklahoma's AD and has announced he will retire from his full-time position this academic year, said college officials should study how businesses outside of sports address similar issues.

“I think (CBAs) have to be part of the conversation for sure,” Castiglione said. “Undoubtably, there's a lot for us to figure out. There are a lot of components to that that aren't easily managed. That being said, we should not let the difficulty deter us from having a full conversation about how we can create a sustainable environment for college athletics. We certainly don't have that now.”

The NCAA and its members know they can't rely on Congress to come to the rescue.

The House of Representatives declined last week to vote on a bill that would shield the NCAA from antitrust lawsuits. The SCORE Act failed to come to the floor despite backing not only from the NCAA, but also from the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, the White House and some athletes.

The bill has faced opposition from unions and various states’ attorneys general.

“I would love to say we've got to rely on ourselves to figure something out, but I know it's been very challenging,” Maryland AD Jim Smith said. “There's been a lot of people working on it over a period of time, so I can't say it's frustrating Congress isn't helping. I think they are trying. It's just a very complicated issue with a lot of people with a lot of opinions.”

In June, a federal judge approved a $2.8 billion settlement that set the stage for rewriting rules involving paying players in college sports. That led to the creation of the College Sports Commission, which oversees the players' name, image and likeness contracts. In November, the CSC announced it had given the OK to $87.5 million in deals for athletes.

With so much money involved, schools are trying to come up with creative ways to raise revenue to not only run day-to-day operations, but also to attract top recruits to be competitive in the different fields and courts of play.

Utah entered into a partnership Tuesday with a private equity firm with the hopes of raising $500 million. Other athletic departments have resisted taking such a step, but the talk at the forum was the Utes' foray into this venture might prompt more schools to do the same.

“We have the biggest operating budget in the country — $320-ish million — and we spend every penny,” Bjork said. “It's not like we're spitting off a 10% profit every year. We have to operate basically 34 sports (of 36) at a loss, and if we have the same number of sports as, say, Texas (with 21 teams), we have a $60 million problem. We don't, so we need to be creative. We need to drive more revenue. If that's a permanent capital revenue partner, maybe that's the way to do it.”

AP Sports Writer Eddie Pells contributed to this report.

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football