SamTrans is trying to shore up a projected deficit, which has been exacerbated by lower sales tax revenue and an unfavorable economy.
The agency’s projected structural shortfall is not as severe as other major transit operators, such as BART and Caltrain, however, it still has had to take cost-cutting measures to keep its budget in check.
Fiscal Year 2025, which ended in June, had a deficit, though one-time funds were able to cover the difference, Chief Financial Officer Kate Jordan Steiner said during a Board of Directors meeting Nov. 5.
“The [sales tax] revenues for Fiscal Year ’25 did finish below budget, reflecting the slower local and regional economic activity, driven by economic uncertainty, tariffs, policy shifts from the new administration and inflation,” Steiner said.
However, expenses were about 10% lower than anticipated, “driven by lower consultant usage, lower [American Disabilities Act] and multimodal shuttle usage,” Steiner said.
Recommended for you
For the current fiscal year, sales tax revenue is expected to remain flat.
“The short-term outlook has improved, but this is largely driven by one-time savings and timing. We have a structural imbalance in our operating budget, and there’s increasing pressure on our operating budget, as we’ve exhausted the prior year carry-forwards,” Steiner said. “We’re experiencing a slowdown in sales tax and also the decline in certain state and federal funding.”
In June, SamTrans adopted a $323.7 million operating budget for this fiscal year — from July 2026 to June 2027 — with the Fiscal Year 2027 operating budget projected at $339 million, however, it still has anticipated a modest structural deficit. One-time funds were able to close the gap last year, but after 2027, those funds will be exhausted, according to a previous press release from SamTrans.
The projections speak to the financial challenges most transit operators are facing throughout the region. While the bulk of the funds would go to rail agencies like BART and Caltrain, a ballot measure, if passed by voters, would impose a regional 14-year sales tax measure to help shore up operator deficits.
Folks, SamTrans will keep an eye on the structural deficit – as it gets larger and larger due to ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Note their “reined in” expenses are closer to optional changes rather than changes which would make a real difference. Note also that their biggest expense is not touched at all, ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Until SamTrans gets their fiscal house in order, vote NO on any transit measures looking to transfer more of your money to union transportation workers. It is apparent SamTrans isn’t doing anything to decrease the structural deficit.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Folks, SamTrans will keep an eye on the structural deficit – as it gets larger and larger due to ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Note their “reined in” expenses are closer to optional changes rather than changes which would make a real difference. Note also that their biggest expense is not touched at all, ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Until SamTrans gets their fiscal house in order, vote NO on any transit measures looking to transfer more of your money to union transportation workers. It is apparent SamTrans isn’t doing anything to decrease the structural deficit.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.