King Center cannot take a back seat 

The city is now deciding which public spaces to rebuild first. That decision will reveal not only our priorities but our values. The city’s recent Facilities Condition Assessment provides one of the clearest pictures yet of how decades of deferred maintenance have left our community spaces in crisis. Of roughly 100 municipal buildings, 60 were analyzed in detail. Citywide repairs could cost more than $360 million, including $77 million in urgent health and safety fixes and approximately $15 million needed to fully modernize the King Center. 

Both the King Center and Joinville Swim Center were built in 1968 and are long past their useful life. Joinville’s challenges are serious: seismic vulnerability, outdated systems, and leaks that could soon render it unusable. Those issues deserve attention. However, the King Center’s condition is just as critical and far more consequential for the community it serves.

The city’s assessment identifies noncompliant locker rooms, seismic risks and failing pool systems, with both pools out of code due to undersized plumbing and expired filtration equipment. The report calls for a comprehensive renovation, including new all-electric systems, and the complete replacement of both pools and decks. What the King Center needs is not maintenance. It is survival 

Despite the scale of need, the King Center continues to receive less urgency and fewer guarantees of completion. That imbalance matters because the King Center is more than a recreation site. It is also being advanced as a resiliency center, a place designed to provide shelter, power and support during emergencies. In a city that has already endured historic flooding, resilience is not optional. It is essential infrastructure. 

City leaders have taken important steps. The council created a $25 million capital reserve to help seed priority projects, and an $850,000 federal earmark for the King Center was secured through the advocacy of former Mayor Amourence Lee and Supervisor Noelia Corzo, along with support from city staff. Those are meaningful beginnings. But beginnings must become commitments. The city has already acknowledged that overall facility needs far exceed available resources and will likely require a future revenue measure. When that measure comes forward, the King Center must be named and protected as a top priority. 

But behind every spreadsheet is a story of people and place. The Joinville facility serves the 

Shoreview neighborhood, while the King Center serves North Central, a historically Black, Latino and immigrant community that has faced disinvestment for generations. When one pool’s closure triggers swift mobilization and the other’s deterioration is met with more study, it sends a message no budget line can erase. Capital planning is a moral document. It shows whether every neighborhood is viewed as worthy of safety, access and dignity. 

There is momentum to build on. Through the Koshland North Central San Mateo Collaborative, neighbors and organizations have turned vision into action. Working with the Parks and Recreation Department, the Collaborative has hosted cultural events, youth programs and listening sessions that reflect the neighborhood’s strength and aspirations. Beginning next spring, partners aim to launch after-school enrichment through the Police Activities League, peer counseling and wellness groups through Peninsula Family Service, and family engagement and health workshops with CORA, PCRC and BACHAC. This work proves the King Center is not a liability. It is a living asset. 

For me, the King Center holds a deeply personal significance. Every weekend, my family and I are at the field and playground. My son, who turns 2 in December, runs across the same grass, now turf, that generations before him have played on. I want him to grow up learning to swim, play and belong at a center that shows his neighborhood matters and deserves the same investment, pride and care as every other part of San Mateo. 

Residents who share this vision should voice their support as the city shapes its next capital plan and considers a funding measure. The King Center cannot take a back seat. If San Mateo truly believes in equitable investment, rebuilding the King Center must not be a footnote. It must be the headline. 

Dr. Charles Hansen is a Koshland Fellow with the San Francisco Foundation, working with local partners to advance equity and resilience in North Central San Mateo.