Editor,
I was largely in agreement with Joe Guttenbeil [letters, Nov. 25: “Local Dems don’t understand”] until his final paragraph: “Change the message and messengers or else the Red Wave will continue for far longer than four years”
Editor,
I was largely in agreement with Joe Guttenbeil [letters, Nov. 25: “Local Dems don’t understand”] until his final paragraph: “Change the message and messengers or else the Red Wave will continue for far longer than four years”
Yes about the message and messengers. But what ‘Red Wave?’
Former President Trump won a historic election, the first since Grover Cleveland in 1892 where a former president has won a nonconsecutive second term. And he did it decisively, winning six more electoral votes and six more states than Joe Biden won in 2020 while improving his performance with all demographic groups compared to his two prior races, as well as being the first Republican to win the popular vote in two decades.
But there was no red wave on Nov. 5. As of Nov. 26, four Democratic incumbent congressmembers lost their seats while five Republicans lost theirs. The House will remain essentially unchanged, with Republicans continuing to hold one the narrowest majorities in history.
In fact, the red wave happened four years earlier — yes, when Trump was prevented from a second term by then Vice President Biden. Thirteen Democratic incumbents, including three in California, lost their seats, yet, not one Republican incumbent lost his/her seat.
This was an historic election and,, as Joe wrote, the Democrats need to understand why they lost the presidency and four Senate seats. They can also ask how many Senate seats they would have lost had President Biden remained on the ticket.
Irvin Dawid
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(5) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Dawid. I guess it depends on how a “red wave” is defined because from countrywide election analyses, the country has shifted to the right. And in the recent election, the “red wave” in swing states was the most important. As election integrity is strengthened, I believe the red wave will continue to dominate the House and the Senate as it will become more difficult for Democrats to steal elections in states with no voter ID. Regardless, any comments on the current cast of Trump cabinet picks? I don’t think DOGE has their sights set high enough. And I’ve heard rumors they’re going to turn federal buildings into detention facilities. Imagine the newly named Pelosi federal building as a federal penitentiary. It might placate some to know that when she shows up in the office, she’s housed in a penitentiary. Not soon enough, for some.
Terence,
You wrote, "I believe the red wave will continue to dominate the House..." This is simply false. The Dems gained one seat this election. How is that a red wave?
Thanks for your question, Irvin D. You’ll note that I qualified my red wave with the strengthening of election integrity. Other than swing states without voter ID, I believe Harris won the rest of the states who don’t require voter ID. In California (I haven’t checked other states) ballot harvesting is allowed and which is used by Democrats to “steal” elections. Have you ever wondered why some elections, even with Republicans comfortably ahead after the majority of votes have been counted, somehow end up with Democrat candidates edging out Republicans, even in “red” districts? Likely statistically impossible, but not impossible with ballot harvesting and counting of non-voter ID votes.
In my estimation, at least two or three House seats in California were “stolen.” In the rest of the US, it’s likely more House seats and at least several Senate seats were “stolen.” If election integrity is strengthened across the land, I’d say the red wave will continue in the House and Senate as well as translating to more “red” victories in state government, also.
Hello, Irvin
Rather than ask the question, "What red wave?"... maybe the question should be, "What blue wall?"
Thanks for your LTE. Enjoy the holidays.
Well said, Ray!
You too on the holidays.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.