Editor,
Rod Linhares is running for San Mateo City Council and he is anti-choice. You won’t hear him say it out loud, but his work and his actions say it.
Editor,
Rod Linhares is running for San Mateo City Council and he is anti-choice. You won’t hear him say it out loud, but his work and his actions say it.
Rod works for the San Francisco Archdiocese, one of the most conservative in the country. His job is fundraising and development. The Archdiocese donated $20,000 to the No on Proposition 1 campaign. This is the press release from the San Francisco Archdiocese declaring their mandate of “defeating Prop 1 our number one priority for this year.” https://sfarchdiocese.org/noonprop1/
You won’t hear Rod talking about this because he wants to get elected, but if you listened carefully to the San Mateo City Council Candidate Forum last month, there were a few “choice” words missing. All of the candidates were asked if they support a woman’s right for choice. All were unanimous in their support ... except in Rod’s answer, I heard the word “contraception” substituted for “choice.”
I’m old, and I remember. I was in high school before Roe. My older sister had three classmates who got pregnant. Two of them came from families with money. They went to Europe for their abortions. One came from a family without money. She had an illegal abortion. She died.
Elaine Salinger
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(12) comments
What does "choice" and abortion have to do with City Counsel position?
It has to do with stepping stones to higher positions and more power to deny women's rights, of course.
Good morning, Elaine
Thanks for your LTE. I don't know Rod, but is he really "anti-choice" or is it possible he just makes different choices than you would make? If that's the case, would Rod's choices invalidate the DJ's endorsement of him for a seat on San Mateo's city council?
Perhaps it may have something to do with avoiding the shredding of thousands of unborn babies? Most pro-choice supporters seem to conveniently ignore what goes on during abortion procedures.
Regardless of how you feel about abortion, it is hardly valid to refer to it as the shredding of unborn babies. It is not okay to force a person to gestate a fertilized egg until it becomes a baby. It is a zygote from when egg and sperm meet until it begins dividing, then an embryo for the first eight weeks, and a fetus from then until birth. It is a baby only after it is born.
Forcing someone to perform this act of gestation, which often can result in death of the "host," is horrific and dehumanizing.
"We really need to get over this love affair with the fetus and start worrying about children." --Joycelyn Elders
Err - Westy - you are an intellectual person but many of your cohort and perhaps you seem to support abortion right up to viability and birth. That means cutting a not-yet- born-baby into pieces that can be extracted and sold as tissue. That is what pro-lifers are talking about. It is murder! I think we treat dogs better than that. Most strict abortion laws allow for mitigating measures if the life of the mother is in danger or there are other extenuating circumstances that justify an abortion. Remember that you were a fetus once as well. And Joyceylin Elders is a an affront to humanity, no body should even think of her as a role model.
That is a whole lot of very untrue propaganda. Women who are well into their pregnancy do not generally choose abortion unless it is under very difficult circumstances. You haven't been in their shoes, why do you think you should make the decision for them? I encourage you to read some of the stories from women who had to make the decision to terminate a pregnancy that would result in a baby that could not survive. For one of many examples, the situations are many and varied, yet you would make the decision for all. A dear friend was in that situation. She chose to continue the pregnancy, and ushered her baby through many expensive surgeries (are you willing to pay for these?) until he died. I respected her decision; she also had the means to be a full-time caregiver, having a husband who made a lot of money and no other children or elderly parents to care for.
The mitigating measures for life of mother that you refer to are 1) ambiguous, so that doctors sometimes feel they must wait until a woman is actively dying in order to proceed 2) do not fit the situation of having to continue a pregnancy with a fetal abnormality that will not result in a baby that cannot live, or for oh so many other situations.
Another thing that points to the anti-choice movement's hypocrisy and callous disregard for people is that the majority of its proponents seem to be actively against taxes and government support for the pregnant people who need medical care and the hospitals and social services that keep children safe, healthy and fed.
And no, I was not once a fetus. The soul does not enter the body until birth. I was not a person until I was born. My mother had to put a lot of work into growing that fetus into a person. She did it willingly, I do not believe she should have been forced to do it.
Westy
Regardless of how you feel about abortion, it is hardly valid to refer to the growing human being inside a mother's womb as something other than a unborn child for the entire term of the pregnancy. You choose words like zygote and embryo and that's OK, but later in a pregnancy to say the human being growing inside a mother's womb is only a baby "after it is born" is IMO just a convenient way for abortion advocates to deny that an unborn child is... a child.
An excerpt from the Cleveland Clinic, one of the best hospitals in the US, re: a fetus' development during weeks 13-16 of a pregnancy, "The fetal heartbeat may now be audible... fingers and toes are well-defined. Eyelids, eyebrows, eyelashes, nails and hair are formed. Teeth and bones become denser. The fetus can even suck his or her thumb, yawn, stretch and make faces. The nervous system is starting to function. The reproductive organs and genitalia are now fully developed..." Westy, maybe all those things happening during this stage of a pregnancy is why there is a "love affair with the fetus."
"Choice" on what issue? He might be for "choice" on education or gun rights. Seems to me the letter writer is Cathophobic more than for "choice."
I think most responders have it right. What does "choice" have to do with quaifications to represent District 5 on the San Mateo City Council? As for the effects on higher political ambitions, I think voters wil be smart enough to evaluate those if and when any candidate runs for some "higher office". But what I find most interesting is that, based on an internet search (which I knw is not always accurate), Dr Salinger is a long itme resident of the San Mateo Highlands. NOT within the City of San Mateo. So she is not only raising a spurious concern, but she is not even eligible to vote in this election.
How about some transparency on the part of letter writers?
Good information to have! Electing those who would deny women the right to health care is to provide them with their next stepping stone. Not to mention that issues can and do come up at the local level, such as doctors and clinics being threatened. The country is on a slippery slope. Pharmacists in some states are now refusing to fill certain prescriptions based on gender in case a woman or girl might use it to induce an abortion. For a man, they would fill that same prescription with no questions, but females must be monitored and policed.
San Mateo Climate Action and Move San Mateo are hosting a candidate forum on Monday from 7-8:15pm! The link to register is here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUqcu6vpzgvHN22zr1li9Shw5mYe4Ntepd0?blm_aid=245287054
The San Mateo United Homeowners Association is hosting a virtual candidate forum on October 13th Date/Time: Thursday, Oct. 13, 7pm-9pm.
https://www.facebook.com/SanMateoUnited/
These are just two of many opportunities to hear directly from the candidates.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.