When a grand jury accuses your county sheriff, something is deeply broken.

The accusations against Sheriff Christina Corpus by the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury is not just an individual crisis — it’s the culmination of years of political inaction and a repeated refusal to implement meaningful, independent civilian oversight. We are not here because of one person’s actions alone. We are here because our county leaders failed to act when they had the chance.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(8) comments

Terence Y

I believe Rahm Emanuel said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.” Here we have Mr. Lawrence attempting to take advantage of the Corpus debacle in a thirst for power. Never mind that taxpayers are already footing the bill for a civilian oversight commission which to my knowledge hasn’t produced anything of value (or anything newsworthy). Except, of course, costing taxpayers… And there’s no guarantee that any civilian oversight commission with “teeth” would make any difference in the proceedings. Instead of wasting more taxpayer money, let’s let this serious crisis to go waste and deprive a thirst for power.

NancyG

Regarding the cost to taxpayers: lawsuits pending against the county related to the crisis in the Sheriff's Office currently total $30M or more. Cutting off bad behavior at a much earlier point in time could prevent the escalation of problems into multi-million-dollar lawsuits.

Dirk van Ulden

Nancy - this would only work if the Oversight body has subpoena power and can refer to the DA. However, even the DA appears either dragging his feet or can't figure out what to do. We seem to have a law for everything but a recalcitrant sheriff can't be shoved out the door. A revision in our County Charter should spell out that the results of a Measure, like "A" is binding and requires/demands immediate removal from office. Whoever concocted Measure A was likely a sheriff beneficiary. We are being taken to the cleaners because of duplicitous behavior at the highest levels.

Terence Y

And, NancyG what makes you think a civilian oversight commission with “teeth” would make any difference? As Mr. van Ulden has noted, the powers-that-be with their full force of law hasn’t done much to prevent the increasing number of lawfare issues. If anything, if there were a civilian oversight board weighing in, Corpus would just add a few more names to her list of folks to sue. And why not?

Speaking of multi-million-dollar lawsuits, don’t be surprised if the sergeant placed on administrative leave without reason on Thursday files a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against Corpus and San Mateo County in the near future. At this point, I’d encourage anyone, directly or indirectly, affected by Corpus file lawsuits against Corpus and San Mateo County. I hear San Mateo County is flush with cash after receiving a portion of their VLF funds in California’s new budget. If I recall correctly, punitive damages are taxable so when setting the amount in the lawsuit claim, add a little extra to pay the feds and California.

Ariolimax

The argument for adopting a governance structure like Sonoma or Los Angeles Counties to address the San Mateo County Sheriff crisis is overkill and misaligned with local realities. San Mateo County’s population is 97% under city governments, with only 3% in unincorporated areas, compared to Sonoma’s 26% and Los Angeles’ 7% under county governance. These counties’ oversight models suit their larger, more rural unincorporated populations, where county sheriffs have broader jurisdiction. San Mateo’s compact, urbanized structure means city police handle most law enforcement, reducing the need for such extensive county-level oversight.

The call for a Civilian Oversight Commission and Inspector General assumes the voting booth isn’t enough, but San Mateo’s engaged electorate already provides effective civilian oversight. The Board of Supervisors’ Independent Civilian Advisory Committee, while limited, reflects a tailored approach. Strengthening it sensibly is prudent, but copying Sonoma or Los Angeles’ heavy-handed models is unnecessary and risks bureaucratic overreach in a county where local accountability already works.

NancyG

Oversight isn’t just about investigating what went wrong — it’s a deterrent. When people in power know they are being watched, they’re far less likely to abuse that power. Deterrence is one of the most effective tools we have to protect public trust and institutional integrity.

There is no panacea for corruption or malfeasance, but it's consistently clear that secrecy, lack of accountability creates fertile ground for bad actors. We need only to look to the Trump administration to see what a lack of consequences and accountability breeds. Oversight protects the public not just by responding to misconduct, but by deterring it.

Terence Y

Correction, NancyG. We need only to look at the treasonous Biden administration to see what a lack of consequences and accountability breeds. And what happens when oversight is complicit in a lack of consequences and accountability. Again, look to those with oversight over the treasonous Biden administration. Was there any? Dems and complicit mainstream media had no issues turning their backs on public trust and institutional integrity when they opened our borders. Have a Trump-tastic day!

Dirk van Ulden

Very nice Nancy - this must have been keeping you awake. "We need only to look to the Trump administration to see what a lack of consequences and accountability breeds". Last I heard, lawfare is still in full swing despite Supreme Court decisions, there is still a Congress, and Trump has repeatedly said that he will comply with all Constitutional provisions. And you compare his administration with the sleazy activities perpetrated by the sheriff and her sycophants? TDS has trickled down, hasn't it?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here