After leading Redwood City for a decade, retiring City Manager Melissa Stevenson Diaz has seen the city evolve through a pandemic, transform through significant development and respond to the growing dependency residents have on their local government.
Melissa Stevenson Diaz
As she prepares to retire — there is one last City Council meeting she will be seated for Monday, Dec. 22 — Stevenson Diaz said she’s honored to end her entire public service career at Redwood City.
“It’s a gift to do work that you value,” Stevenson Diaz said.
Stevenson Diaz began work in Redwood City in October 2015, after working for three other cities in two different counties. There’s no place like working in Redwood City and San Mateo County, though, she said.
“That relations between county government and city government aren’t as constructive in other places,” Stevenson said. “The fact that there is such a strong history of working together effective was something I was glad to build on.”
While councilmembers and city staff may come and go, whether it’s term limits or turnover, Stevenson Diaz and her role as city manager served as a throughline. When people join the city, in whatever capacity that may be, Stevenson Diaz tells them that “you’re jumping onto a moving train.”
“This has been going on a long time, there are reasons for things we do, and a lot of opportunities for change,” Stevenson Diaz said. “It’s invigorating being able to constantly adapt and grow with new perspectives and have new people come into these roles.”
Providing that support was particularly critical during the pandemic, a job that was succinctly described by Stevenson Diaz as “hard” but ever-evolving.
“We were all learning as we went … as an adaptive challenge, it was one of the most significant things to work through in my career, for sure,” she said.
“She is remarkably selfless, working tirelessly to ensure the city delivers excellent services to the community while also making certain her staff feels supported and values,” Heisinger said.
Recommended for you
Stevenson Diaz first announced her intent to retire in June and Heisinger was announced as her successor, taking over the job in January. Developing leaders in the City Manager’s Office and throughout the city is one of Stevenson Diaz’s greatest joys.
“To develop people with leadership capacity to support and work in local government, that’s something I’ve felt great about,” Stevenson Diaz said.
Stevenson Diaz’s work on establishing a robust diversity, equity and inclusion framework for the city underscored every initiative on which the city worked.
“It really comes from recognizing we are here for public service,” she said. “One of the ways to know if you’re doing good public service is to look under the hood a little bit and see if we’re really reaching the community.”
During her tenure, addressing homelessness became a focal point of the city, but it wasn’t always that way. Once considered a “big city issue” has trickled through the suburbs and local government has had to step up and take initiative to make sure its residents were housed, Stevenson Diaz said.
“It’s not city government that can solve all the economic conditions we’re facing, but it is exciting to lean in and figure out what we can do,” Stevenson Diaz said.
The Navigation Center, a critical temporary housing facility based in Redwood City and operated by San Mateo County, was one effort to address homelessness made possible by a close working relationship between the city and county, Stevenson Diaz said.
“These things aren’t getting solved at a bigger, federal level,” she said. “Cities have had to look at how can we share resources and make sure residents know what they can access and how we can support them.”
While Heisinger doesn’t intend to try to fill Stevenson Diaz’s shoes — “Melissa established a legacy in Redwood City that will be difficult to replicate” — he will try to emulate how effectively she communicated.
“Melissa instilled in me the understanding that most people simply want to know what is going on,” Heisinger said.
Stevenson Diaz is looking forward to stepping away from the grind of local government. While the extra time to spend with family, travel and volunteer are “not earth-shattering plans,” she’s looking forward to the chance to slow down, just a bit.
“Right now, I’m running early in the morning, before it’s even light out and I have to wear a headlamp,” Stevenson Diaz said. “Retiring means also retiring my headlamp, and only running after the sun is up.”
Interesting that the city manager chose the Navigation Center as her strongest project. It was always a county project and had nothing to do with her. But the she started to interfere.
Here is what really happened:
- The County wanted to upgrade Maple Street Shelter to accommodate over 200 unhoused at a cost of $8M.
- The county also wanted to demolish the old Women's prison to create a RV parking.
Redwood City did not like that plan - they wanted to turn inner harbor and Bair Island into a high-end neighborhood:
- So first the created the Bair Island development claiming there is already affordable housing at Docktown nearby.
- Redwood City then closed down said low-income neighborhood to replace the affordable houseboats with high-end, luxury townhomes.
- Stevenson Diaz also promised the developer a $40M bridge-to-nowhere connecting Bair Island and the Maple Street townhouses faster to US-101. It's called the Bloomquist Extension Bridge - or Bridge-To-Nowhere because it's an expensive and unnecessary boondoggle.
Anyways, the county plans and the Maple Street shelter were in the way of Stevenson Diaz. So she did an expensive switch of property with the promised outcome of:
- the Maple Street shelter and woman's prison would be demolished at very high cost
- the RV parkers get a Safe Parking Lot on what was supposed to be a RWC Waterfront Park.
- the county will get a center lot, but that is in danger of flooding, so they took $50M in CA Project Homekey money. NOT to the benefit of unhoused, but to upgrade the county's property.
Now the property is much more valuable than before. Nevertheless they only put a few cheap sheds on top of that valuable land and called it "Navigation Center".
In 10 years, when nobody remembers the history, they will go back, close out the Navigation Center for some made-up reason and will have ended up with a valuable lot they can sell and create more waterfront townhomes.
The residents will then be stuck with more unhoused and still paying down a million dollar bridge they didn't ask for.
Don't believe me? The "Safe Parking Lot" has already been replaced by a car dealership. RV dwellers have been removed years ago and are back parking on the street.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Interesting that the city manager chose the Navigation Center as her strongest project. It was always a county project and had nothing to do with her. But the she started to interfere.
Here is what really happened:
- The County wanted to upgrade Maple Street Shelter to accommodate over 200 unhoused at a cost of $8M.
- The county also wanted to demolish the old Women's prison to create a RV parking.
Redwood City did not like that plan - they wanted to turn inner harbor and Bair Island into a high-end neighborhood:
- So first the created the Bair Island development claiming there is already affordable housing at Docktown nearby.
- Redwood City then closed down said low-income neighborhood to replace the affordable houseboats with high-end, luxury townhomes.
- Stevenson Diaz also promised the developer a $40M bridge-to-nowhere connecting Bair Island and the Maple Street townhouses faster to US-101. It's called the Bloomquist Extension Bridge - or Bridge-To-Nowhere because it's an expensive and unnecessary boondoggle.
Anyways, the county plans and the Maple Street shelter were in the way of Stevenson Diaz. So she did an expensive switch of property with the promised outcome of:
- the Maple Street shelter and woman's prison would be demolished at very high cost
- the RV parkers get a Safe Parking Lot on what was supposed to be a RWC Waterfront Park.
- the county will get a center lot, but that is in danger of flooding, so they took $50M in CA Project Homekey money. NOT to the benefit of unhoused, but to upgrade the county's property.
Now the property is much more valuable than before. Nevertheless they only put a few cheap sheds on top of that valuable land and called it "Navigation Center".
In 10 years, when nobody remembers the history, they will go back, close out the Navigation Center for some made-up reason and will have ended up with a valuable lot they can sell and create more waterfront townhomes.
The residents will then be stuck with more unhoused and still paying down a million dollar bridge they didn't ask for.
Don't believe me? The "Safe Parking Lot" has already been replaced by a car dealership. RV dwellers have been removed years ago and are back parking on the street.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.