To paraphrase on old saying, the chaos will continue until morale improves.
The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, finally having fired Sheriff Christina Corpus, decided Tuesday night that it will appoint a new sheriff, who will serve out the remainder of a term that runs through 2028. The vote was 3-2, with supervisors David Canepa and Jackie Speier dissenting in substantially different ways.
After the unanimity the board demonstrated in removing Corpus, cracks are beginning to show.
A FORCED HAND: The prospect of reelecting former Sheriff Carlos Bolanos, who confirmed here — perhaps too soon — that he was considering running in a possible special election, appears to have turned off some on letting “the voters decide.”
Which they are not going to do.
The eloquence of supervisors Noelia Corzo and Ray Mueller notwithstanding, the three-vote majority decided to favor their judgment over the small number of voters who might show up at an off-brand election. Mueller compared it to a city council picking a police chief; three board members — Lisa Gauthier, Mueller and Canepa — are former councilmembers. Gauthier, participating remotely from Rome in the middle of the night, was visibly supportive of the comparison.
Mueller’s most pointed remarks echoed those of Julie Lind, head of the San Mateo County Labor Council, who said Sheriff’s Office personnel at every level favor appointing a sheriff as soon as possible to end the considerable and exhausting stress and pandemonium that has characterized the office for two years. Mueller said more than once that the office needs “healing.”
HEAL THYSELF: Then there is the hoo-ha in Millbrae over “sleeping quarters” at the police station, which, incidentally, is said to have been there for 20 years, including when Corpus held the title of police chief. There is widespread suspicion that Corpus had a hand in this controversy, spurred by the fact that the story was broken by her main news media mouthpiece. Add to the weirdness the conduct of Millbrae City Manager Tom Williams and Mayor Anders Fung, who used the occasion to undermine Millbrae Chief Eamonn Allen, who is accused of “commuting” from Idaho and using the sleeping quarters as a bedroom. All this is caught up in a spillover of other disputes between the city and the county, and some currently unfocused ambitions.
Beyond the specifics, it demonstrates how vulnerable the Sheriff’s Office remains to mischief, so long as there is no one in charge at the top.
CODE OF, UM, CONDUCT: In the midst of an agenda all about picking a new sheriff, Corzo decided to take a seemingly unrelated shot at Canepa for his outraged remarks to the news media about the Millbrae stuff, most notably, “If someone is living out of county or out of state, they have to pay for their own lodging, meaning San Mateo County is not a Holiday Inn.”
Recommended for you
One of the undercurrents in the board’s personal and professional interrelations is Canepa’s evident hunger for news media attention.
Corzo took him to task, saying he misrepresented the circumstances. “Don’t continue to fall for that tabloid-style of reporting,” she said. Canepa tried to interrupt her. She stopped him. He tried again and Mueller stopped him. Later, as Canepa made a convoluted attempt to defend or explain himself — his face reddening, his voice rising — Mueller told him to move on. “I’m chairing the meeting,” Canepa said. “Then please chair it,” Mueller said.
It would appear they do not like each other all that much.
Speier and Gauthier stood by like witnesses at a car wreck.
INTO THE BREACH: But here they go, picking a new sheriff, as Robert B. Gunnison used to say, “under the meanest of deadline pressures.”
The board has until Nov. 13 to recruit applicants, vet them, interview them, have them hold some kind of public forum, narrow the field to some finalists, and then pick one. Just to ratchet up the timeline, County Executive Mike Callagy said the deadline for applicants will be Nov. 5. Or as Speier kept saying, as she argued for an election, “Six days.”
What kind of applicants will turn up in such a tight window?
No one knows how many — or whether even one — will meet the formal qualifications.
Then, as any job applicant knows, there are the more-challenging informal requirements that have been tossed into the mix — including a refusal to cooperate with ICE, a record of community relations and modern policing, experience running a jail, accepting oversight from an inspector general.
It took the board eight months to fire the sheriff. It will pick a new one in two weeks.

(1) comment
Thanks, Mr. Simon, for your ongoing episode recaps of the “As the Sheriff’s World Turns” soap opera. Even though the SMC-BOS is appointing a new sheriff, wouldn’t residents be able to place another measure or initiative to remove the sheriff if they’re not happy with the selection? Or would folks need to recall the BOS member(s) who agreed with the appointment? I don’t believe there’s an issue with getting the public to weigh in, but ultimately, is this only for show to claim public input was listened to, while BOS members will go along their merry little way with a backroom deal based on “inside” influence? Ultimately, if the new Sheriff isn’t going to support ICE operations to remove criminals and terrorists from our community, then are we in much of a different boat than before? Regardless, I look forward to your columns in the near future – perhaps a few “special edition” columns due to the shortened length of upcoming activities? As always, they’d be appreciated.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.