California Attorney General Rob Bonta on Sunday sent a letter to Woodside town officials warning that their effort to declare the town to be a mountain lion habitat is an attempt to avoid complying with the state’s newly enacted affordable housing law.
“An entire town cannot be declared habitat for a protected species,” Bonta wrote in the letter. “There is no valid basis to claim that the entire town of Woodside is a habitat for mountain lions.”
According to public documents posted on Woodside’s Planning Department website, the town believes that because the state Fish and Game Commission lists mountain lions as an endangered species, no parcel in the town is eligible for a Senate Bill 9 project, which starting Jan. 1 made it legal for property owners to split single family lots into smaller sizes. Woodside said those lot sizes, at 1,200 square feet each, would be smaller than the minimum lot size required by the Town’s zoning rules.
In a press release, the Attorney General’s office said the mountain lion habitat claim is contrary to the law and contrary to efforts to alleviate the state’s affordable housing issues.
In Woodside small homes are currently listed for sale on Zillow at $1 million and up; a 1-bedroom apartment rent is about $2,500 a month.
Recommended for you
“My message to Woodside is simple: Act in good faith, follow the law, and do your part to increase the housing supply,” Bonta said. “If you don’t, my office won’t stand idly by.”
Specifically, the letter states:
There is no valid basis to claim that the entire town of Woodside is a habitat for mountain lions. Habitat is land that has the capacity to support a specific species, including providing food and shelter. Land that is already developed — with, for example a single-family home — is not, by definition, habitat; and
Any exemption under SB9 requires the town to examine the attributes of an individual parcel of land. An entire town cannot be declared habitat for a protected species, and the exemption of a specific lot would have to be based on substantial evidence.
Nice try Woodside. You're going to need to come up with another clever reason why the beautiful people of Woodside are exempted from complying with SB9.
Nice try, Woodside. It may be easier to start following the leads of other cities finding ways to blunt the deleterious impacts of SB9 and SB10. You could always claim multiple environmental impact studies are required. The key is delay, delay, and delay. Besides, you should know that in CA the only sanctuary plea that is acceptable are those protecting non-Americans and criminals. After all, making America (and CA) Last is the new credo for CA.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
Nice try Woodside. You're going to need to come up with another clever reason why the beautiful people of Woodside are exempted from complying with SB9.
Sure, Woodside--nice try, NIMBYS!
Nice try, Woodside. It may be easier to start following the leads of other cities finding ways to blunt the deleterious impacts of SB9 and SB10. You could always claim multiple environmental impact studies are required. The key is delay, delay, and delay. Besides, you should know that in CA the only sanctuary plea that is acceptable are those protecting non-Americans and criminals. After all, making America (and CA) Last is the new credo for CA.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.