South San Francisco projects an improved financial state this fiscal year compared to prior estimates, while ongoing concerns about structural deficits remain.
The 2025-26 fiscal year, ending in June, is expected to end with a $600,000 deficit, a significant improvement from the initial $5.8 million gap forecasted earlier this year. According to a recent presentation at a council meeting, revenue from the city’s transient occupancy, or hotel, tax came in about $2 million higher than anticipated, and unsecured property tax — which covers business equipment rather than real estate — is close to $2 million, a major increase.
Still, the city anticipates a $5.5 million operating deficit for the upcoming year, though it proposes closing the gap via an unassigned general fund balance, or funds that have accumulated over prior years and are not earmarked for specific services.
"This is not a panic button moment," Finance Director Christie Donnelly said during a recent council meeting. "We do remain strong and in a position to be able to manage the immediate shortfall without cutting services or dipping into our policy reserves … However, this is also not a moment for complacency."
The main financial hit the city is taking is related to a revenue source tied to vehicle license fees, a complicated reimbursement that the state historically provides to Peninsula cities each year, though most jurisdictions have failed to receive the full amounts over the last couple years. That has triggered a lawsuit between the county and state, and as a result, many cities, including South City, are either lowering their projected VLF revenue or removing it from their budget estimates altogether.
In addition to excluding the reimbursement in future fiscal planning, South City’s budget is also not incorporating a $5.2 million reimbursement owed to the city from 2024-25.
Recommended for you
“We’re absorbing a hit from Sacramento that we didn’t cause or we didn’t vote for,” Councilmember Eddie Flores said during the meeting. “This is the state's problem landing on our doorstep, and really, we're handling it the best way that we can and we’re handling it responsibly as financial stewards of this city."
Mayor Mark Adiego also echoed the frustration, noting that a billboard along Highway 101, which is meant to depict the city’s VLF predicament, needs to convey a stronger message.
“It does nothing,” Addiego said. “[We need to] show Sacramento lifting dollars out of the South San Francisco treasury, because what’s up there now, nobody even notices it.”
The city also projects that personnel costs, which comprise about three-quarters of the general fund budget, will continue increasing by at least 3.4%. CalPERS liability payments and health insurance premiums are increasing rapidly as well.
The council will review the budget again in June for final adoption.
Folks, the most important takeaway is near the end of the article. Where 75% of the current general fund budget is for personnel, and increasing by at least 3.4%. More evidence that any money you vote to transfer to SSF via tax proposals will only benefit ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits of union workers.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Folks, the most important takeaway is near the end of the article. Where 75% of the current general fund budget is for personnel, and increasing by at least 3.4%. More evidence that any money you vote to transfer to SSF via tax proposals will only benefit ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits of union workers.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.