Editor,
As a 30-year employee and president of CSEA Chapter 33 representing classified staff at San Mateo County Community College District, our union overwhelmingly voted to endorse John Pimentel for Trustee in Area 5 on Nov. 3.
Editor,
As a 30-year employee and president of CSEA Chapter 33 representing classified staff at San Mateo County Community College District, our union overwhelmingly voted to endorse John Pimentel for Trustee in Area 5 on Nov. 3.
Mr. Pimentel is what’s needed to address the needs of our district. He’s an inspiration to our students, after all — his story is their story. From community college, to Berkeley and ultimately graduating from Harvard, he embodies everything we want for our students, and what they want for themselves. Through John they will see there’s no limit for their future.
I’ve been impressed at John’s focus to learn about the district he hopes to represent. He’s developed plans, presented ideas to the current board, asked tough questions and demanded transparency. He’s studied the budget, policies and has sought input from employees.
John isn’t just a listener, he’s a man of action. His business experience will keep our district financially sound while introducing innovative ideas that address the needs of today’s students. He’s proposed several initiatives that create opportunity and enable equity such as tuition-free SMCCCD, doubling the Promise Scholars Program and a rapid retraining program for service industry workers displaced by COVID. He will be an advocate for policies that attract and support first-generation college families and underserved communities to SMCCCD.
Please vote for John Pimentel as the next San Mateo County Community College Trustee in Area 5 on Nov. 3.
Annette Perot
San Mateo
The letter writer is the
president of the CSEA Chapter.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
I have known Ms. Perot for many years and have discussed her work at CSM and she has excellent first hand knowledge. If she is recommending Mr. Pimentel then it is with good reason. Definitely vote for him in Area 5.
Transparency - that is a buzzword in government. Who, except Donald Trump, would not advocate for transparency?
Before the pandemic, the SMCCCD Board spent over a year discussing whether they should broadcast meetings, as done at many colleges as standard practice. Some Board members were concerned that it would result in "grandstanding" by fellow Board members; others were concerned about cost and logistics.
Just before the pandemic closed in-person meetings, I read Mr. Pimentel's letter to the editor, "Video coverage for SMCCCD Board meetings." (March 2, 2020). I agreed with his conclusion, "Any administration that avoids disclosure and transparency is likely to be hiding something." For example, as a resident of the county, I had been trying to find out about the highly unusual circumstances leading to Mr. Galatolo's transition from Chancellor, to Chancellor Emeritus, and then Chancellor Emeritus on paid administrative leave, and finally Chancellor Emeritus on paid administrative leave being investigated by the DA, but to no avail. Galatolo never retired or resigned; the Board gave him a new contract with unheard of perks for a public institution, with pay of $1.2 million (of which he is paid $39K a month until March 2022). The Board was mum to any and all of my queries. Doesn't the community, which pays this freight, deserve some answers?
Soon thereafter, the Board began broadcasting meetings via Zoom given the Governor's State of Emergency. Why didn't they do it much earlier as Mr. Pimentel suggested. What were they hiding?
Read Mr. Pimentel's March 2 letter to the editor on transparency. He deserves your vote. SMCCCD belongs to the citizens of San Mateo County, not a small cadre of Trustees who are only accountable every few years to your vote.
--
Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College District. mreiner32205@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-b-reiner-phd-14057551/
Mr. Reiner,
Excellent explanation and endorsement. I absolutely agree.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.