Large-scale, countywide changes are coming to El Camino Real over the next decade, one of which may include eliminating a lane of travel on at least one stretch of the corridor in South City.

State Route 82, or El Camino Real, serves as a main road spanning the entire county north to south, but improving the often-dangerous walking and biking conditions is notoriously difficult, given it falls under state, not local, jurisdiction.

Recommended for you

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(2) comments

easygerd

quote: "The Grand Boulevard Initiative is a nearly 20-year-old effort that involves ECR improvements throughout the entire county."

The idea of adding different options of travel (public and active transportation) to ECR goes back to the 1970s.

So for over 50 years now our esteemed, most sustainable, public-transit loving, children-adoring San Mateo Democrats in Congress, the Senate, the Assembly, the Board of Supervisors (looking at Jackie Speier here), C/CAG, Peninsula Clean Energy, and on various city councils couldn't get even one mile of protected bike lane onto ECR.

They already wasted millions on "studies" and "outreach" over the last 50 years, but have absolutely nothing to show for.

Now that is beyond pathetic.

Terence Y

Here we go again…setting the stage for more tax proposals to waste your money rewarding transit union workers. And attempting to do so with biased assumptions. For instance, the City Council says “…reducing the lanes would subsequently decrease the number of total vehicles traveling on the corridor.” Or, the number of total vehicles will remain the same and cause more traffic and gridlock, especially if there isn’t enough room for buses to stop or there aren’t dedicated turn lanes. Or perhaps these vehicles will begin traveling neighboring streets, increasing their congestion. And then we have Mr. Coleman assuming folks will begin riding BART and Caltrain more. Um, if they haven’t done so now, chances are they won’t in the future due to the inconvenience of the “final mile.” Regardless of their biased assumptions, vote NO on any transit related tax measures. They’ll happily spend it, and more, and come back to you again and again to continually pay for wage increases and ever-increasing pensions and benefits.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here