Good, I thought, perhaps I’ll learn something about the candidates and Mark’s insights will assist in making a decision. But no, the entire article was about how much money each had raised and arguably most of us don’t care, unless a great deal of money came from special interests. If you’re going to take one-third of a page of valuable newsprint space, please reward your reader’s time with information that’s worthwhile.
Mr. Batchelder, if you’re not interested in hearing how candidates are financed, what are you interested in? Hot air and empty promises using amorphous buzzwords of the day, such as equity, equality, affordable housing, tax the rich, etc.? Anyone can make empty promises. Campaign financing is a much better predictor of how candidates will vote. How about a candidate’s accomplishments, if any, regarding fiscal stewardship? Anyone can spend somebody else’s money, but do they treat somebody else’s money as their own? Or do they spend money discriminately, for “favored” groups?
Hopefully you've been able to see the series of articles the Journal has been doing on each of the candidates running for this congressional seat. Very thorough introductions to the candidates, their history, and the main reasons they are running. Here are a few links:
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Mr. Batchelder, if you’re not interested in hearing how candidates are financed, what are you interested in? Hot air and empty promises using amorphous buzzwords of the day, such as equity, equality, affordable housing, tax the rich, etc.? Anyone can make empty promises. Campaign financing is a much better predictor of how candidates will vote. How about a candidate’s accomplishments, if any, regarding fiscal stewardship? Anyone can spend somebody else’s money, but do they treat somebody else’s money as their own? Or do they spend money discriminately, for “favored” groups?
Hopefully you've been able to see the series of articles the Journal has been doing on each of the candidates running for this congressional seat. Very thorough introductions to the candidates, their history, and the main reasons they are running. Here are a few links:
https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/south-san-francisco-assemblymember-seeks-congress-seat/article_8519a342-bc71-11ec-8b31-17b96f2a2572.html
https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/san-mateo-county-supervisor-aims-for-congress/article_4569eeb2-bade-11ec-8cfe-3f1bfec6cc9b.html
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.