For all the buzz around Congresswoman Jackie Speier’s retirement, little has been said about a woman or person of color running to replace her. The immediate assumptions of those that would run (and likely win), were the white men that hold the top offices in the county. If a white man replaces the congresswoman, we would essentially go from little diversity to almost none.
On Wednesday, I regained some hope. Emily Beach stepped up to the plate to replace Jackie Speier for Congress in District 14. Emily is no ordinary woman by far — a mother of two, veteran, former mayor and current councilmember, musician and advocate for childhood education. A lot can be said of someone that hasn’t spent most of their adult life in politics, but instead, focused on helping others and serving their country. She said, “When people hear my story, about my broad life experience, it will relate with the people of San Mateo County.”
Her life story begins on the East Coast — her father from rural Maine and her mother from New Jersey — both her parents grew up poor, but Emily’s grandparents understood the value of education and raised their kids to strive for upward social mobility. Emily told me about her paternal grandfather, how he had to hunt sometimes to put food on the table. And, how her dad’s heater during the winter months, was a large stone that was first heated on a fire. “My grandfather was a salt-of-the-earth New Englander,” she told me as she shared anecdotes of how hard-working folks did what they could to survive. Emily’s mom grew up with three generations in her household, and her mom, along with her uncle, was the first to go to college.
Beach’s dad is Beach’s hero. His military journey inspired Emily to join the ROTC which landed her a scholarship to Notre Dame. Her studies inspired her passion for social justice and service. As a student, she studied in Spain for a year to perfect her Spanish, and also spent time in Immokalee, Florida, as a legal aide for political asylum cases, translating between English and Spanish. Her experience gave her firsthand knowledge of the immigrant experience — as she mentioned, “folks come to the U.S. to seek a better life, because many times, they’re fearing for their lives.”
After college, she joined the military and was stationed around the world, including South Korea and Saudi Arabia. It was in the latter country that she faced some challenges for being a woman, and at times had to wear an abaya in public for fear of facing imprisonment. “I was a lieutenant ... it was interesting to serve in Saudi Arabia, as a woman, as a patriot missile commander, if I had to meet with my colonel that was an hour away, I had to sit in the back of a Suburban in a full abaya over my uniform, because I could’ve been arrested for being a woman that wasn’t in black abaya.”
Her travels gave her a renewed sense of appreciation for our country, “we live in the best country and we have more work to do,” she said. She met her husband in the military while both were stationed in South Korea and, in 2000, they decided to move to the Bay Area. Her husband, Duff, attended law school at UC Hastings, while Emily was the main breadwinner. Starting from humble beginnings as a young couple, Emily, Duff and their kids first lived in San Francisco’s Mission District in a one-bedroom apartment. They later moved and chose Burlingame for its great schools and proximity to the train into San Francisco.
Recommended for you
While in Burlingame, Emily joined the Burlingame Community Education Foundation and worked to grow it. Under her leadership as president of the board, she grew the foundation from $1 million to $1.8 million in annual grants. She was emphatic that it was a community-driven effort. Her work in education sparked her desire to run for office. Elected in 2015, she worked hard to create change in her community and is proud of her achievements like increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour and championing bike lanes and better transit. She also navigated Burlingame as mayor during the pandemic — an unenviable position for most.
“I’m a fixer and a coalition-builder,” she told me. And with the toxic state of politics in Washington, she promises to find common ground, learn from her peers, and fight for the issues affecting America: climate change, mental health, housing, labor and health care.
My two cents: She’s a strong candidate for Congress. And I’m not the only one that thinks so — Speier’s longtime treasurer picked Emily as his client for this campaign. There is hope.
I was heartbroken to learn that Rep. Speier was not running again and am equally hopeful that we'll find a wonderful person to fill her well-worn shoes.
Wait, Mr. Murray, you’re endorsing a candidate just because she’s a woman? What happened to your push for diversity, equality, or whatnot for people who are not white? Or people who are or LGB or some other letters I forgot? Perhaps you’re not that big a fan of diversity, equality, or whatnot for people who are not white. Maybe instead of highlighting the race, or sex, of people, we just document people’s highlights and lowlights in the voter handbook and do like we’re doing with other people, cancel their names and only refer to them as numbers. Then let the best person win, regardless of their race or sex or some other arbitrary quota.
Did I miss something? Supervisor David Canepa is Hispanic. I think he would make an excellent Congressman. He cares deeply about working families and reforming our juvenile justice system.
A Hispanic is a person that is a Spanish speaker. I don't know if Canepa speaks Spanish or not. You'd have to ask him. Also, this article isn't against anyone, it's about Emily Beach because women are often overlooked in politics.
Perfect, I speak some Spanish so I guess I can now say I’m Hispanic instead of just saying I identify as one. When needed of course, to meet some arbitrary quota or take advantage of some discriminatory policy.
Hey Rudy - could you please drop the race card every time you get to write an article? She has impressive credentials and is a viable candidate without you pigeonholing her. If we were to vote for a candidate based on gender or race, wouldn't we all be xenophobes and/or racists?
I feel Dirk makes a good point. Your position that women and persons of color make better candidates primarily just because of their gender or ethnicity has been stated in these pages more than once... more than twice. However, do we really want someone elected to represent us... all of us... based on gender or ethnicity? That being said, I agree with Dirk... Emily has impressive credentials and she is a viable candidate. While In my view, Emily's accomplishments do exceed the credentials of some of the names that have bandied about recently... the question for voters will be whether those credentials make her the best choice for office.
We exchanged comments after your November 19 op-ed... a column that advanced the idea that women and persons of color were better suited to represent folks in our county because... well, because of their gender and/or ethnicity. Friday's column seems to be a variation on that theme. Yes, yes... I understand you believe women are underrepresented in government, but the question remains... should a candidate be elected based on their gender?
The responses to yesterday's column appear to be positive about Emily's candidacy, and that positive reaction comes from both sides of the political aisle. It looks like DJ readers' biases favor candidates with impressive credentials. Emily's experiences have made her a person who understands the challenges facing persons in our county who may be under resourced. That's a big plus, but does a candidate have to be a specific gender to understand those challenges?
BTW... thanks for chronicling Emily's accomplishments in your column. It is a great way to introduce a viable candidate to DJ readers.
Maybe you could elaborate on your suggestion that DJ readers take a "hard look" at their biases. Have you done the same?
No one should be elected based on their gender. I’m not saying that at all. People should be elected on based on values, life experience, professional experience, plans, etc. Gender plays a role under life experience and diversity. If you can agree that diversity is a strength than you can see the value in what I’m saying. If you don’t agree that equity and diversity are a good things for politics we can agree to disagree and avoid the topic altogether. The reason I highlighted Emily is because she’s an incredible option that runs the risk of being sidelined because the men get all the attention, money, and endorsements. That’s why I’m sharing HER story. By uplifting her story, it’s my attempt at bringing equity into this race. Im not saying the guys are bad, I’m saying Emily is just as good.
No question that Emily is good, and I as I said yesterday her accomplishments “exceed the credentials of some of the names that have bandied about” as possible candidates. I’m sure you’re aware the county’s pundits have picked Kevin to win California’s 14th Congressional district next year. Do you think his credentials and experience make him a viable candidate?
Diversity and equity can be good things until they overwhelm the election process and fixing perceived imbalances becomes the driving force in getting a specific candidate elected. Opposing such a candidate does not mean someone also opposes diversity and equity… it just might mean they believe a different candidate is better equipped for service in public office.
Last year, the DNC pushed diversity and equity on the Democratic Party’s faithful as Joe mulled over his selection to fill the VP spot on the Democrats’ presidential ticket. If Joe was committed to picking a woman of color… and there were plenty of credentialed and viable women* who would have done a good job… why did he pick Kamala Harris? Yes, she certainly met the DNC’s diversity and equity criteria, but she has been a disaster as vice president. With Kamala’s dismal showing as a presidential candidate, didn’t anyone on the left side of the aisle see the iceberg off the starboard bow?
* Maybe Val Demings, Stacey Abrams, Tammy Duckworth, Lujan Grisham or Karen Bass? I’m guessing any one of them would have taken the border crisis a lot more seriously than Kamala has...
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(17) comments
I was heartbroken to learn that Rep. Speier was not running again and am equally hopeful that we'll find a wonderful person to fill her well-worn shoes.
Well written summary. Thanks Rudy. Very in depth. Much appreciated.
You're welcome! I think Emily has a very interesting story that people should hear about before heading to the ballot box. 🙏🏽
Wait, Mr. Murray, you’re endorsing a candidate just because she’s a woman? What happened to your push for diversity, equality, or whatnot for people who are not white? Or people who are or LGB or some other letters I forgot? Perhaps you’re not that big a fan of diversity, equality, or whatnot for people who are not white. Maybe instead of highlighting the race, or sex, of people, we just document people’s highlights and lowlights in the voter handbook and do like we’re doing with other people, cancel their names and only refer to them as numbers. Then let the best person win, regardless of their race or sex or some other arbitrary quota.
Thanks, Mr. Murray-looks like a good candidate!
Did I miss something? Supervisor David Canepa is Hispanic. I think he would make an excellent Congressman. He cares deeply about working families and reforming our juvenile justice system.
Hispanic? His wife is, but I thought he was of Italian heritage.
I believe he is Mexican and Italian.
A Hispanic is a person that is a Spanish speaker. I don't know if Canepa speaks Spanish or not. You'd have to ask him. Also, this article isn't against anyone, it's about Emily Beach because women are often overlooked in politics.
Perfect, I speak some Spanish so I guess I can now say I’m Hispanic instead of just saying I identify as one. When needed of course, to meet some arbitrary quota or take advantage of some discriminatory policy.
Forget the gender pitch. She is a member of a truly underrepresented minority = veterans.
Hey Rudy - could you please drop the race card every time you get to write an article? She has impressive credentials and is a viable candidate without you pigeonholing her. If we were to vote for a candidate based on gender or race, wouldn't we all be xenophobes and/or racists?
Hello, Rudy
I feel Dirk makes a good point. Your position that women and persons of color make better candidates primarily just because of their gender or ethnicity has been stated in these pages more than once... more than twice. However, do we really want someone elected to represent us... all of us... based on gender or ethnicity? That being said, I agree with Dirk... Emily has impressive credentials and she is a viable candidate. While In my view, Emily's accomplishments do exceed the credentials of some of the names that have bandied about recently... the question for voters will be whether those credentials make her the best choice for office.
Please show me where I say that people of color or women make better candidates. I think y'all need to take a hard look at your biases...
Good morning, Rudy
We exchanged comments after your November 19 op-ed... a column that advanced the idea that women and persons of color were better suited to represent folks in our county because... well, because of their gender and/or ethnicity. Friday's column seems to be a variation on that theme. Yes, yes... I understand you believe women are underrepresented in government, but the question remains... should a candidate be elected based on their gender?
The responses to yesterday's column appear to be positive about Emily's candidacy, and that positive reaction comes from both sides of the political aisle. It looks like DJ readers' biases favor candidates with impressive credentials. Emily's experiences have made her a person who understands the challenges facing persons in our county who may be under resourced. That's a big plus, but does a candidate have to be a specific gender to understand those challenges?
BTW... thanks for chronicling Emily's accomplishments in your column. It is a great way to introduce a viable candidate to DJ readers.
Maybe you could elaborate on your suggestion that DJ readers take a "hard look" at their biases. Have you done the same?
No one should be elected based on their gender. I’m not saying that at all. People should be elected on based on values, life experience, professional experience, plans, etc. Gender plays a role under life experience and diversity. If you can agree that diversity is a strength than you can see the value in what I’m saying. If you don’t agree that equity and diversity are a good things for politics we can agree to disagree and avoid the topic altogether. The reason I highlighted Emily is because she’s an incredible option that runs the risk of being sidelined because the men get all the attention, money, and endorsements. That’s why I’m sharing HER story. By uplifting her story, it’s my attempt at bringing equity into this race. Im not saying the guys are bad, I’m saying Emily is just as good.
Good evening , Rudy....
No question that Emily is good, and I as I said yesterday her accomplishments “exceed the credentials of some of the names that have bandied about” as possible candidates. I’m sure you’re aware the county’s pundits have picked Kevin to win California’s 14th Congressional district next year. Do you think his credentials and experience make him a viable candidate?
Diversity and equity can be good things until they overwhelm the election process and fixing perceived imbalances becomes the driving force in getting a specific candidate elected. Opposing such a candidate does not mean someone also opposes diversity and equity… it just might mean they believe a different candidate is better equipped for service in public office.
Last year, the DNC pushed diversity and equity on the Democratic Party’s faithful as Joe mulled over his selection to fill the VP spot on the Democrats’ presidential ticket. If Joe was committed to picking a woman of color… and there were plenty of credentialed and viable women* who would have done a good job… why did he pick Kamala Harris? Yes, she certainly met the DNC’s diversity and equity criteria, but she has been a disaster as vice president. With Kamala’s dismal showing as a presidential candidate, didn’t anyone on the left side of the aisle see the iceberg off the starboard bow?
* Maybe Val Demings, Stacey Abrams, Tammy Duckworth, Lujan Grisham or Karen Bass? I’m guessing any one of them would have taken the border crisis a lot more seriously than Kamala has...
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.