Rudy Espinoza Murray column

For all the buzz around Congresswoman Jackie Speier’s retirement, little has been said about a woman or person of color running to replace her. The immediate assumptions of those that would run (and likely win), were the white men that hold the top offices in the county. If a white man replaces the congresswoman, we would essentially go from little diversity to almost none. 

On Wednesday, I regained some hope. Emily Beach stepped up to the plate to replace Jackie Speier for Congress in District 14. Emily is no ordinary woman by far — a mother of two, veteran, former mayor and current councilmember, musician and advocate for childhood education. A lot can be said of someone that hasn’t spent most of their adult life in politics, but instead, focused on helping others and serving their country. She said, “When people hear my story, about my broad life experience, it will relate with the people of San Mateo County.” 

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(17) comments

craigwiesner

I was heartbroken to learn that Rep. Speier was not running again and am equally hopeful that we'll find a wonderful person to fill her well-worn shoes.

Eaadams

Well written summary. Thanks Rudy. Very in depth. Much appreciated.

Rudy E

You're welcome! I think Emily has a very interesting story that people should hear about before heading to the ballot box. 🙏🏽

Terence Y

Wait, Mr. Murray, you’re endorsing a candidate just because she’s a woman? What happened to your push for diversity, equality, or whatnot for people who are not white? Or people who are or LGB or some other letters I forgot? Perhaps you’re not that big a fan of diversity, equality, or whatnot for people who are not white. Maybe instead of highlighting the race, or sex, of people, we just document people’s highlights and lowlights in the voter handbook and do like we’re doing with other people, cancel their names and only refer to them as numbers. Then let the best person win, regardless of their race or sex or some other arbitrary quota.

Tommy Tee

Thanks, Mr. Murray-looks like a good candidate!

Johanna Rasmussen

Did I miss something? Supervisor David Canepa is Hispanic. I think he would make an excellent Congressman. He cares deeply about working families and reforming our juvenile justice system.

willallen

Hispanic? His wife is, but I thought he was of Italian heritage.

Johanna Rasmussen

I believe he is Mexican and Italian.

Rudy E

A Hispanic is a person that is a Spanish speaker. I don't know if Canepa speaks Spanish or not. You'd have to ask him. Also, this article isn't against anyone, it's about Emily Beach because women are often overlooked in politics.

Terence Y

Perfect, I speak some Spanish so I guess I can now say I’m Hispanic instead of just saying I identify as one. When needed of course, to meet some arbitrary quota or take advantage of some discriminatory policy.

willallen

Forget the gender pitch. She is a member of a truly underrepresented minority = veterans.

Dirk van Ulden

Hey Rudy - could you please drop the race card every time you get to write an article? She has impressive credentials and is a viable candidate without you pigeonholing her. If we were to vote for a candidate based on gender or race, wouldn't we all be xenophobes and/or racists?

Ray Fowler

Hello, Rudy

I feel Dirk makes a good point. Your position that women and persons of color make better candidates primarily just because of their gender or ethnicity has been stated in these pages more than once... more than twice. However, do we really want someone elected to represent us... all of us... based on gender or ethnicity? That being said, I agree with Dirk... Emily has impressive credentials and she is a viable candidate. While In my view, Emily's accomplishments do exceed the credentials of some of the names that have bandied about recently... the question for voters will be whether those credentials make her the best choice for office.

Rudy E

Please show me where I say that people of color or women make better candidates. I think y'all need to take a hard look at your biases...

Ray Fowler

Good morning, Rudy

We exchanged comments after your November 19 op-ed... a column that advanced the idea that women and persons of color were better suited to represent folks in our county because... well, because of their gender and/or ethnicity. Friday's column seems to be a variation on that theme. Yes, yes... I understand you believe women are underrepresented in government, but the question remains... should a candidate be elected based on their gender?

The responses to yesterday's column appear to be positive about Emily's candidacy, and that positive reaction comes from both sides of the political aisle. It looks like DJ readers' biases favor candidates with impressive credentials. Emily's experiences have made her a person who understands the challenges facing persons in our county who may be under resourced. That's a big plus, but does a candidate have to be a specific gender to understand those challenges?

BTW... thanks for chronicling Emily's accomplishments in your column. It is a great way to introduce a viable candidate to DJ readers.

Maybe you could elaborate on your suggestion that DJ readers take a "hard look" at their biases. Have you done the same?

Rudy E

No one should be elected based on their gender. I’m not saying that at all. People should be elected on based on values, life experience, professional experience, plans, etc. Gender plays a role under life experience and diversity. If you can agree that diversity is a strength than you can see the value in what I’m saying. If you don’t agree that equity and diversity are a good things for politics we can agree to disagree and avoid the topic altogether. The reason I highlighted Emily is because she’s an incredible option that runs the risk of being sidelined because the men get all the attention, money, and endorsements. That’s why I’m sharing HER story. By uplifting her story, it’s my attempt at bringing equity into this race. Im not saying the guys are bad, I’m saying Emily is just as good.

Ray Fowler

Good evening , Rudy....

No question that Emily is good, and I as I said yesterday her accomplishments “exceed the credentials of some of the names that have bandied about” as possible candidates. I’m sure you’re aware the county’s pundits have picked Kevin to win California’s 14th Congressional district next year. Do you think his credentials and experience make him a viable candidate?

Diversity and equity can be good things until they overwhelm the election process and fixing perceived imbalances becomes the driving force in getting a specific candidate elected. Opposing such a candidate does not mean someone also opposes diversity and equity… it just might mean they believe a different candidate is better equipped for service in public office.

Last year, the DNC pushed diversity and equity on the Democratic Party’s faithful as Joe mulled over his selection to fill the VP spot on the Democrats’ presidential ticket. If Joe was committed to picking a woman of color… and there were plenty of credentialed and viable women* who would have done a good job… why did he pick Kamala Harris? Yes, she certainly met the DNC’s diversity and equity criteria, but she has been a disaster as vice president. With Kamala’s dismal showing as a presidential candidate, didn’t anyone on the left side of the aisle see the iceberg off the starboard bow?

* Maybe Val Demings, Stacey Abrams, Tammy Duckworth, Lujan Grisham or Karen Bass? I’m guessing any one of them would have taken the border crisis a lot more seriously than Kamala has...

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here