The San Mateo City Council has rejected the proposed donation of a 3.2-acre property because the terms of the deal have changed to give ownership to both San Mateo and Hillsborough.
Located at 40 Baywood Ave., the property sits on both jurisdictions: the larger 1.9-acre parcel is in San Mateo and the smaller 1.34-acre parcel is in Hillsborough. On the property is a 7,000-square-foot Victorian home built in 1899, a redwood grove and newly renovated koi pond.
Thelma Lilienthal, who owns the property, initially offered to donate it to San Mateo only along with an $8 million endowment for upkeep of the property, which would become publically accessible. Councilmembers welcomed that offer.
But Lilienthal has since changed her mind and is now proposing both San Mateo and Hillsborough own and manage the property. Lilienthal is also now proposing a reduced $5 million endowment that wouldn’t go directly to either city, but to the trustee for the estate in perpetuity to be used for capital improvements and not operations. The proposed endowment has dropped as a result of changes in the economy as well as recent capital investments made to the property, according to city staff.
While potential programming for the property was never decided, staff is estimating it would cost the city $100,000 a year to manage the property even if it was used for revenue generating events.
San Mateo councilmembers are not interested in the new offer.
“The way it was originally proposed is very different. I was pretty comfortable with it being donated to just [San Mateo] and for us to maintain it with that money and not have a trustee, but this is a whole other thing. … It’s not going to work with these current terms,” said Mayor Joe Goethals.
Councilman Rick Bonilla agreed.
“I think 3.24 acres is not big enough for both San Mateo and Hillsborough to be involved in trying to work all these issues out,” he said. Bonilla also said the property has insufficient parking and he anticipates disagreements with Hillsborough on how the property should be used. “We’re two different places and at this point I just don’t think we can afford to take it on. Unless they want to change the way they’re doing it, it’s no good for us.”
San Mateo officials have been interested in using the property primarily for events, including conferences and weddings, while Hillsborough wants to use it as a daytime park as there is little common open space elsewhere in the town.
Recommended for you
Vice Mayor Eric Rodriguez said meetings last year about San Mateo taking on the property made him ecstatic, but was saddened by the new proposal.
“It would prevent us from fulfilling Ms. Lilienthal’s vision for that property and it doesn’t make sense for San Mateo,” he said. “It’s an amazing home, amazing tea garden, amazing grounds. I just hope it remains open to the public.”
Councilwoman Diane Papan said the new terms concern her because she feels the cities couldn’t reconcile their different visions for programming and because San Mateo might in the future be asked to contribute more money to it.
“Where it got tricky for us was a different need in programming and also a different size in city coffers,” she said. “I got concerned if down the line more money was needed and the size of our coffers might be called upon and not in equal fashion.”
Goethals suggested Hillsborough will likely move forward with the proposed property donation.
“In the current form it sounds like Hillsborough is excited to move forward and if they want to take this on I wish them well and that’s good for them,” he said.
The Hillsborough Town Council will discuss the future of the property in June.
As a San Mateo resident who takes walks in that area, I think its a great idea to use the space as a day park, where people can walk in and enjoy the grounds, trees, shade etc. Even for a modest donation of ~$5 at the gate.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
As a San Mateo resident who takes walks in that area, I think its a great idea to use the space as a day park, where people can walk in and enjoy the grounds, trees, shade etc. Even for a modest donation of ~$5 at the gate.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.