San Mateo city officials are once again discussing further building codes for new construction and home renovations with the goal of eliminating natural gas use, and an Aug. 30 virtual webinar will provide an opportunity to learn more.
The City Council 2022-2023 strategic goals has called for working on policies to decarbonize existing buildings and eliminate methane gas use in buildings by 2030 to limit carbon emissions, prompting the push for stricter codes.
The community meeting will be to discuss more electrification requirements for home renovations, new construction and electric vehicle infrastructure, with a focus on home renovations. The city’s current reach codes expire this year, with San Mateo’s Infrastructure and Sustainability Commission interested in further restrictions on gas appliances to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The proposal for new home renovations calls for electric appliance outlets in all single-family kitchen and laundry renovations and installing a new heat pump for air conditioning and water heater for new installation or replacement. Panel replacements would also require space for future electrification. Outdoor equipment like electric or solar pool heating is required, while no gas infrastructure for fire pits, grills and pools would be allowed.
The proposal calls for any new construction to be all-electric, strengthening the city’s current requirement that all new residential and office buildings be all-electric. Exceptions would be available for commercial kitchens and hotel and motel laundry services.
The city also recommends enhanced electric vehicle charging infrastructure requirements for new construction projects. It suggests single-family and townhomes have at least one level two electric vehicle space per unit and one level one space if a second space is available, with infrastructure like electrical panel space, circuits, attachment plugs and other power outlets required. A level two charging station offers a higher and faster charge than its level one counterpart, which comes with a car when bought. However, significant cost barriers come with electric vehicle infrastructure. A level two charging station costs around $500 to $700, and labor for installation can cost an extra $1,000 or more. Upgrades to electrical systems can cost more.
The move to electric vehicles coincides with ambitious state plans to get 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles on California roads by 2025. The state recently announced it will ban the sale of new gasoline cars by 2035, with interim stages to phase out gas cars, increasing the need for more electric vehicles and the infrastructure to maintain them. According to Peninsula Clean Energy, a joint powers authority providing energy to San Mateo County, California hopes to have 250,000 publicly available EV charging stations by 2025. As of October 2019, California had around 18,500 public level two charging ports. San Mateo has around 121 public charging stations, of which four are free, according to PlugShare, an app designed to find charging stations.
The city is making recommendations based on findings from the Bay Area Reach Codes team, a coalition of various government organizations like Peninsula Clean Energy, Silicon Valley Clean Energy, East Bay Community Energy and the San Mateo County Office of Sustainability. The groups have played a part in helping craft ordinance languages for other Peninsula cities, with Belmont and Half Moon Bay recently passing stricter electric reach codes aimed at new construction and remodels.
San Mateo’s current reach codes expire Dec. 31 and were adopted in 2019. The city will adopt new codes this fall, starting on Jan. 1, lasting three years. According to the city, transportation accounts for 50% of greenhouse gas emissions in San Mateo, followed by electricity and natural gas use in buildings at 34% of emissions.
(4) comments
Instead of virtue signaling, shouldn’t San Mateo city officials concentrate on more pressing problems? Unless San Mateo can localize the air above them, this is a waste of time and effort. Newsom has already extended the operation of natural gas plants that were scheduled to be closed – now there’s no sunset for these plants – due to electrical demands. It sounds like Newsom, in addition to the 5 new natural gas plants supplying electricity, should now order a few more natural gas power plants. To save on transmission losses, I’d recommend Newsom build a few in the Bay Area, perhaps in the San Mateo hills. I’d recommend we have a virtual webinar on turning San Mateo city officials jobs into part time status, since it appears there’s plenty of wasted time, now, and in the future, on this all electric boondoggle thing. BTW, for those interested, James Meigs submitted a great op-ed yesterday: https://www.ocregister.com/2022/08/29/the-green-war-on-clean-energy/
..
Another that the commission & council might/should consider in addition to the banning of natural gas (delayed until the delivery system leaks are fixed)
Would be to ban all non-cabon-neutral cement/concrete in all new construction within the city
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/green-tech/a40785162/microalgae-carbon-neutral-cement/
This Carbon-Neutral Cement Is the Future of Infrastructure
It could eliminate the 2 gigatons of carbon dioxide annually pumped into the atmosphere through traditional cement production.
Cement, a key ingredient in concrete, requires mined limestone. Now, researchers are replacing the limestone with microalgae.
Adding in this biogenic limestone can make concrete carbon neutral, and potentially carbon negative, by pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
By growing calcium carbonate through photosynthesis, the biogenic limestone can replace quarried limestone.
Not well-thought-out, IMHO...missing the real issue
The burning of natural gas generates mostly CO2, which is not good for the air & environment. Unburned methane is one of the worst gases that contributes to climate change
But...the real culprit that this is in reaction to is that our delivery system of pipes throughout the country leaks like a sieve
Before going all in on banning home natural gas...the city should look into pushing PG&E to fix their natural gas delivery system leaks
Hoping they find someone who knows enough to convince them to delay this until after the delivery system leaks are fixed
Even then, there are many types of cooking that require open flame. Not induction, halogen, etc.
Like my Wok. Induction requires a min thickness and with the way of Wok cooking, the thickness will then take time to move heat to outer portions of the Wok. Then that with gas, can control cooking areas and their heat. Induction won't be easy.
That would be a ditto to any Restaurant cooking with a Wok or an open flame
FIX THE DELIVERY SYSTEM LEAKS FIRST !
Don't you worry Ben. By the time there is a massive conversion to all-electric homes and businesses, the grid and local distribution will have collapsed. Just make sure you keep your gas lines in good repair. PG&E is doing what it is told to do, as a regulated utility, and is not in a position to counter such idiocy as contemplated by the City of San Mateo.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.