A new “adventure village” playground, one of the major projects as part of San Mateo’s Central Park renovation plan, is moving ahead with lower costs and a reduced scope.

The project budget is about $13 million — largely bolstered by development impact fees — but the estimated cost is now at $8.5 million based on changes to the design. Last year, the council was faced with a funding shortage based on the original plans and bids, which were all higher than anticipated.

Recommended for you

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(2) comments

joebob91

It is disappointing that the City has scaled back the long awaited improvements to this playground. This is especially frustrated given the financial mismanagement demonstrated by the City Council. The Council recently moved towards spending $3M to rip out bike lanes in North Central, despite a plurality of neighborhood residents supporting the bike lanes. Why - so that residents wouldn't have to park in their driveways or garages.

I wish that the Council prioritized the recreational and safety needs of our kids instead of spending millions on the convenience of wealthier residents who can afford 3+ cars.

easygerd

Streets are made for Transportation.

"Parking" can be part of "Transportation", but only meant to be temporary endeavor (let's say 1-4h max) - you need throughput. Once the vehicle is staying overnight, 'parking' happens outside of the governmental definition of being part of the economy. Anything that stays overnight, for 72h or for weeks at a time is by definition "Private Vehicle Storage" and not a government's responsibility anymore.

In other words "Parking" can be a boon to the economy.

"Private Vehicle Storage" however is the bane of society.

If people with too many cars had to pay the $2,000 per year or more on-street parking costs, building a playground would be super easy. The common denominator here might be that the city manager and the city council have a low opinion of children.

Luckily the council thinks weed shops are more important - maybe that makes sense of recent council decisions and lack of budgeting skills.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here