Frustrated with the absence of a plan to clear a backlog spanning almost one year, the San Mateo County Community College District Board of Trustees instructed administrators to swiftly improve the process for documenting public meetings.
Trustees expressed their disappointment that Monday, Jan. 22, marked the most recent set of meeting minutes, which serve as the officially approved record of the discussion and action by the administration and board.
“This kind of good hygiene in a public agency is very basic and I mean this is Small Town USA 101,” said Trustee John Pimentel. “We should not have a problem like this with a $500-million-a-year organization, that we can’t find someone to type up our minutes.”
The pointed discussion during the meeting Monday, Dec. 14, arrived more than one year after trustees previously instructed administrators to clean up the process for minutes keeping, as well as broadcasting meetings to the public.
Remarking that the discussion feels like “Groundhog Day,” the Bill Murray movie in which the same day keeps repeating itself, Trustee Maurice Goodman said the backlog of meeting minutes appears as an indictment on the district’s commitment to transparency.
“At this point, it is our public that is losing out here when it comes to our meetings being months and months behind,” said Goodman.
For his part, Chancellor Michael Claire admitted that the logjam is a problem and committed to fixing it soon.
“We are way behind, and that is unacceptable,” said Claire, adding he plans to return next month with a proposed policy revision which will streamline the process for keeping and publishing minutes.
Officials initiated a discussion regarding minutes and access to board meetings in June 2019. Former chancellor Ron Galatolo had proposed to whittle down the depth of the traditionally exhaustive written minutes to a format which mostly tracks board action and omits much of the discussion surrounding issues.
Trustees at the time scoffed at the proposal to limit the scope of the minutes outright, and instead instructed officials to begin recording meetings with hopes of providing a supplemental document to which those interested can refer.
Administrators returned with a proposal to install in the board room recording equipment projected to cost as much as $100,000. Trustees again disagreed that the initiative would cost so much, nodding to the variety of other local agencies which broadcast meetings for much less money.
Recommended for you
The district eventually was forced by the pandemic to broadcast video conferenced meetings, which are recorded and stored on the school system’s website. With the reliance on the new technology, Claire suggested introducing less comprehensive written minutes with time stamped indexes so those wanting to refer to the video for more details can easily access the material.
“What I’m advocating for is really a complete overhaul of our process,” he said.
Trustees appreciated that proposal, while urging Claire and his team to be more attentive to the issue.
“I think there is great urgency around being brought current. I think we need a policy saying there are X numbers of days, weeks, months by which the minutes are going to be prepared for action,” said board Vice President Richard Holober.
Cañada Spanish professor Monica Malamud added that there is plenty of software available which can help transcribe the meetings and bring the district up to speed.
“It’s just a matter of having the will to do this because I don’t think in the year 2020 this should be an issue,” she said. “It’s just a simple thing to do and a matter of doing it.”
Pimentel agreed, while adding he believes the district needs to be more attentive to honesty and accessibility.
“We should not have public meetings that are not audio and video recorded and we should not wait more than a week to have those minutes that are out for review for the public and a website very soon that actually includes functional data on the performance of our district that we can stand by and be held accountable to,” he said.
In other business, officials briefly discussed an opportunity to use the summer session as a transition to a fall semester when students will hopefully be able to begin returning to campus.
The district, which has been solely offering classes online since the spring, will continue in remote learning through the rest of the existing school year. But Claire expressed some optimism with the arriving vaccine that campuses could begin reopening in 2021.
I support Mr. Pimentel’s desire for transparency. The former administration resisted broadcasting meetings and was finally forced to do so by the Governor’s COVID Emergency Declaration in March 2020. Why hadn’t they done so earlier on their own free will? They claimed expense, but that was an excuse as evident by their current use of Zoom.
In defense of their minutes, the Board did post meticulous minutes until January 2020 and these were much more thorough and informative than many public agencies. They should be commended for doing so and return to providing the public with a record of their activities. As a citizen and researcher, the extensive minutes provided the public with full disclosure of the public meeting.
If the Board wishes transparency, they need to handle email correspondence better. While there is an agenda item to report out on communications with the Board, I wrote numerous correspondence about data and student success that never saw the light of day. To his credit, Mr. Mandelkern did respond to some of these, but primarily it was perfunctory, never engaging in a discussion of the issue. None of my concerns ever made it to the Board agenda, even when I requested time as per protocol. I never even received the courtesy of an acknowledgement of my request for time at the meeting. Interim Chancellor Claire wrote a year ago that the agenda is set by the Board president and he passed my agenda item to President Schwarz, but I heard nothing. I wrote three more times to the Board directly about the agenda item, but no response. That is not transparent.
For correspondence, the new Board should adopt a mechanism like the Menlo Park City Council:
“To express your comments and opinions about a topic, you can email the entire City Council (and senior staff).
Please note: All communications to the City Council and/or city staff are public records subject to the California Public Records Act. Emails sent to this address are provided to the local media and are posted on the city's website for public viewing.”
I believe the SMCCCD Board chose either to ignore my comments or bury them. In fact, once when I wrote to the Board and copied individuals who might be interested, I was criticized in public by Trustee Nuris for having “nefarious” intentions. “Why would you copy half the county?” He and other board members stated in no uncertain terms that communications to the Board are for the Board’s eyes only, not for others in the community. I was shocked that an elected public official was telling me to keep a public comment about official board business private.
Hopefully, the new Board will find a way to transcend the history and tradition of SMCCCD’s desire to keep their cards close to the table as appears to have been the desire of former Chancellor Galatolo and his staff.
--
Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College District. mreiner32205@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-b-reiner-phd-14057551/
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
I support Mr. Pimentel’s desire for transparency. The former administration resisted broadcasting meetings and was finally forced to do so by the Governor’s COVID Emergency Declaration in March 2020. Why hadn’t they done so earlier on their own free will? They claimed expense, but that was an excuse as evident by their current use of Zoom.
In defense of their minutes, the Board did post meticulous minutes until January 2020 and these were much more thorough and informative than many public agencies. They should be commended for doing so and return to providing the public with a record of their activities. As a citizen and researcher, the extensive minutes provided the public with full disclosure of the public meeting.
If the Board wishes transparency, they need to handle email correspondence better. While there is an agenda item to report out on communications with the Board, I wrote numerous correspondence about data and student success that never saw the light of day. To his credit, Mr. Mandelkern did respond to some of these, but primarily it was perfunctory, never engaging in a discussion of the issue. None of my concerns ever made it to the Board agenda, even when I requested time as per protocol. I never even received the courtesy of an acknowledgement of my request for time at the meeting. Interim Chancellor Claire wrote a year ago that the agenda is set by the Board president and he passed my agenda item to President Schwarz, but I heard nothing. I wrote three more times to the Board directly about the agenda item, but no response. That is not transparent.
For correspondence, the new Board should adopt a mechanism like the Menlo Park City Council:
“To express your comments and opinions about a topic, you can email the entire City Council (and senior staff).
Please note: All communications to the City Council and/or city staff are public records subject to the California Public Records Act. Emails sent to this address are provided to the local media and are posted on the city's website for public viewing.”
I believe the SMCCCD Board chose either to ignore my comments or bury them. In fact, once when I wrote to the Board and copied individuals who might be interested, I was criticized in public by Trustee Nuris for having “nefarious” intentions. “Why would you copy half the county?” He and other board members stated in no uncertain terms that communications to the Board are for the Board’s eyes only, not for others in the community. I was shocked that an elected public official was telling me to keep a public comment about official board business private.
Hopefully, the new Board will find a way to transcend the history and tradition of SMCCCD’s desire to keep their cards close to the table as appears to have been the desire of former Chancellor Galatolo and his staff.
--
Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College District. mreiner32205@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-b-reiner-phd-14057551/
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.