In NIL case, judge's decision about 'associated entities' will loom large in college spending
A federal magistrate is considering whether multimedia rights companies representing university athletic departments must follow the same rules for third-party name-image-likeness payments to players
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — A federal magistrate heard arguments Wednesday over whether multimedia rights companies that represent university athletic departments are subject to the same rules governing millions in thid party name-image-likeness payments to players that are reshaping college sports.
Magistrate Nathanael Cousins said he could rule on the matter brought by plaintiffs' attorneys in the landmark House settlement by next week.
Many schools work with MMRs to act as the marketing arms for their athletic departments and arrange third-party NIL deals with athletes. During the 90-minute hearing, plaintiffs attorney Jeffrey Kessler argued that boosters and booster collectives, which have in some cases been replaced by MMRs as the key NIL negotiators, should be deemed associated entities but not the MMRs themselves.
If Cousins agrees that those companies are, in fact, “associated entities,” then deals they make would remain subject to scrutiny by the College Sports Commission, which was formed to analyze NIL contracts to make sure they conform with the guidelines set up by the House settlement.
If Cousins rules in favor of the plaintiffs, then those deals would not be subject to the same scrutiny, which could trigger more spending.
The CEO of the CSC, Bryan Seeley, released a statement saying leaders at the agency “remain confident that the CSC’s application of the rules related to associated entity status is correct and consistent with the settlement.”
Recommended for you
A key test of this rule came last month when a neutral arbitrator ruled in favor of the CSC, which had rejected deals submitted on behalf of Nebraska football players via the school's MMR partner.
Seeley said the rules are designed for disputes to be resolved through neutral arbitration, but plaintiff lawyers “brought this issue back to the federal court with no facts attached in an attempt to circumvent the process.”
Messages left by The Associated Press for Kessler were not immediately returned.
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.