Editor,
I appreciate Zachary Clark’s coverage of Monday’s San Mateo City Council meeting, where the council approved the police budget, as proposed (“No cuts to San Mateo’s 2021 police budget” in the June 17 edition of the Daily Journal.
Editor,
I appreciate Zachary Clark’s coverage of Monday’s San Mateo City Council meeting, where the council approved the police budget, as proposed (“No cuts to San Mateo’s 2021 police budget” in the June 17 edition of the Daily Journal.
There are some quotes in the article around the Police Activities League, including a quote from Councilman Eric Rodriguez defending PAL: “PAL is part of the solution, not the problem,” he claimed.
Important context that is missing from the article, however, is that Mr. Rodriguez literally sits on the board of PAL, which he acknowledged during his remarks. So while he sits on the board of PAL, a nonprofit, Mr. Rodriguez simultaneously voted in his role on the City Council to spend public money on staffing and supervising PAL (Early on in the discussions around PAL funding, city staff claimed all public money is reimbursed by PAL, but they later corrected that statement and made it clear that the city budget pays for PAL staff that is not reimbursed by PAL).
Mr. Rodriguez has a clear and obvious conflict of interest on this matter. He should have recused himself from the budget vote, resigned from PAL or his seat on City Council. It’s outrageous that neither he nor other councilmembers raised this issue during Monday’s meeting. Public commenters were prevented from responding because Mr. Rodriguez’s remarks came after public comment had closed on the matter.
Chet Lexvold
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Chet- what is it that you want regarding PAL. Would you like to not fund it? would you like to end it? Why not come out and say what you want rather than say there is a conflict of interest. Is the councilmen's views different then yours?
Good LTE Chet. It's always good to have reasonable, level-headed ppl commenting on local issues like this and bringing matters like this to light. Thank you!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.