If California opts for smaller changes to prisons, rehabilitation must remain a priority

Almost 3,000 people waited in line to enter a gymnasium and other locations where they were able to meet with dozens of incarcerated facilitators and self-help group volunteers from outside communities. The goal was to take a more active role in pursuing rehabilitation and healing.

“This needs to happen more often for youngsters coming here,” L.L. Romero, a correctional officer who works with The Last Mile coding program, said. “It would help if everyone participated to help build a bond of communication, recognition, respect and relationships. We need to make a change.”

This event promoted TPIB’s so-called Linear Rehabilitation Model proposal, which was first presented to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation last fall.

“What many people don’t realize is participating in rehabilitation while in prison is not mandatory,” TPIB president Arthur Jackson said. “Incarcerated people don’t have to participate in any particular rehabilitation programs, and don’t have a right to any particular programs.” 

Under the group’s rehabilitation plan, incarcerated individuals would enter the prison system and meet with a team of mentors, such as a custody officer, mental health worker and peer mentor, for example. This team will meet newcomers where they are, and help them develop goals for dealing with their trauma, substance use, gang affiliation and other types of issues before they’re released. 

“People in prison should participate in rehabilitation,” Jackson said. “We should have a human right to rehabilitation and healing. A visual road map to rehabilitative success should be created for each individual entering into the system.” 

Under California’s penal code, “the purpose of incarceration is rehabilitation and safe and successful reentry back into the community.”  

CDCRs core values, expressed in its strategic plan, include empowering incarcerated individuals to transform their lives and providing unique programming opportunities so that they have a solid foundation when they return to the community. This requires creating safe spaces for incarcerated individuals to learn and thrive. 

Today’s political climate contrasts the 1990s when Gov. Pete Wilson enacted tough-on-crime laws that essentially converted California prisons to human warehouses. The prison population peaked in 2006, causing essential services for prisoners to almost collapse. Officers suffered PTSD from dangerous, overcrowded conditions.

The population is currently 93,000 and still to large for the state to meet the rehabilitative needs of all prisoners. California’s prison footprint must decrease to accomplish the mission.

Most California prisons don’t have the rehabilitative infrastructure that San Quentin does. But if CDCR utilizes officers as sponsors and allows incarcerated people to act as facilitators, it can give other prisons a taste of San Quentin at no additional cost to taxpayers.

While closing 46 housing blocks may not save much money in the short term, enhancing rehabilitation programming can help population numbers continue to fall and eventually lead to five more prison closures, as the Legislative Analyst’s Office recommends.

It currently costs $132,860 per year to house each incarcerated individual. This cost will continue to rise with people leaving prisons in the same condition they entered it — unless access to rehabilitative programs is improved. 

Steve Brooks is an award-winning incarcerated journalist who resides at San Quentin and works at San Quentin News. He is the first incarcerated participant in the California Local News Fellowship. He wrote this for CalMatters.org, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.