We flatter ourselves that our politics are better — more issue-based, less divisive, less rife with the kind of silly nonsense we see all over the place.
And then we see an exchange in the race for San Mateo County sheriff that is no less absurd, no less beyond our seeming expectations, and we are forced to wonder whether this, too, is all we are.
The sheriff’s race should be about the public’s sense of safety, which is diminishing; whether there is fairness in how all of us are treated by law enforcement, which is very much in doubt; and whether there is leadership that is intolerant of misbehavior and excessive use of force by its troops.
Instead, the latest hoo-ha is about a tattoo. And not a tattoo on one of the candidates, but on a candidate’s spouse.
It has been my practice to regard a candidate’s family as off-limits, unless the family members purposely project themselves into the public eye in a prominent role. Portraits of family members do not count. A husband who also holds public office does count.
In this case, the matter is about a tattoo on the calf of retired sheriff’s Lt. John Kovach, who is married to sheriff’s Capt. Christina Corpus, who is running against incumbent Sheriff Carlos Bolanos.
This should be nothing. Indeed, it is hard to see how it could be anything.
But there it was, the lead front page story in the Palo Alto Daily Post. In the lead spot means it was the best news story they could muster that day, which I am certain is correct. The story bore the headline: “Tattoo emerges in sheriff’s race,” a magnificently incoherent collection of words.
Rumors apparently circulated to the Post about the tattoo and they questioned Corpus about it.
Recommended for you
The tattoo, which Corpus confirmed Kovach got when he was 16 and living in the South, is of Looney Toons character Yosemite Sam and the Confederate flag. Kovach realized the flag was offensive to Californians, and has had it blacked out, Corpus said. She also said the rumors and a photo of the tattoo were circulated by the Bolanos campaign.
All right, then. It’s just one day’s story in a paper with minimal impact outside of Palo Alto. It has nothing to do with management and oversight of the Sheriff’s Office and the qualifications of either candidate.
Except that incumbent Bolanos had to pounce on the issue. The Post story and a comment are posted on the Bolanos campaign Facebook page. The comment is in quotes, but is unattributed to any individual, which shows a lack of minimal accountability.
The comment says: “We are deeply disturbed to read this story in today’s paper. It is frankly shocking that Christina Corpus would try to pretend that the Confederate flag has another meaning than exactly what it is — a sign of racism and white supremacy. It’s less surprising that she would try to cast blame on others in light of this revelation. While Sheriff Carlos Bolanos has a zero tolerance policy for racial bias and discrimination, it seems clear that Capt. Corpus is more flexible on this front. Her disingenuous remarks are to be expected from someone who is purporting to be a Democrat to run for office even though she has spent a lifetime as a registered Republican.”
There is a lot to wade through here. Yes, Corpus could have been less dismissive of the offense caused to some by the Confederate flag. But it is a profound leap from there to concluding Corpus, a Latina, is “flexible” on racial bias, a leap that should have been clear to Bolanos, a Latino, who, incidentally was in charge when Corpus was promoted to captain and her husband to lieutenant.
As for Corpus’ Republican past, it is true and it is fairly recent. I asked a few of the most prominent local Democrats about Corpus’ reregistration, and, as one put it, “The Democratic Party is a big tent. She’s most welcome.”
By the way, sheriff is a nonpartisan office, and party registration should not be a factor, an assertion I recognize as theoretical, at best. And I can think of three current and past popular officeholders who had been Republicans not that long ago. Anyway, in addition to racial bias, it appears Bolanos has zero tolerance for Republicans.
But since it is the county’s highest-ranking law enforcement office and since the Sheriff’s Office’s influence is spreading every year, it begs the question: What else does Bolanos have zero tolerance for, besides tattoos? It might be useful information for, you know, voters.
Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.
I can't believe in 2022 we're still concerned about the opinions of a female office seeker's husband. If SHE had a tattoo with a Confederate flag tattoo, fair game, but even in context here, it sounds like a dumb 16-year-old doing dumb 16-year-old things.
My wife and I have a few different political opinions. And she's smarter, younger, and more-accomplished than me -- she shouldn't be held to what I believe. OTOH, I will ride her coattails as far as I can.
And to those who dismiss it based on drawing supposed equivalencies with other stuff: try hard to expand your thinking beyond binary choices. The real world is filled with shades of gray and, while frustrating to have to deal with that, it’s part of being a critical thinking adult. The good news is one can get better at it with practice.
Unfortunately, Mr. Simon, when you have folks calling Larry Elder the Black face of white supremacy, or folks bringing up long past tweets as reasons to cancel people, or folks making up a Russian dossier to discredit someone, it appears anything goes when it comes to politics. It’s too late to put the genie back in the bottle so we’ll all have to get used to it, and as in the past, separate the wheat from the chaff from their actions. In the case of candidates that have no actions, we may need to take the risk of getting burned and then dealing with voter remorse. To wit, Kevin Mullin – as it appears Mr. Mullin is beholden to special interests more than his constituents.
Party affiliation history of all registered voters is open to public from the elections office. What does asking a few prominent local Democrats about candidates' reregistration have to do with anything?
Let me suggest you re-read that section of the column. I asked because it makes no difference to them if someone was a Republican if they want to be a Democrat now and Bolanos wants to make an issue of Corpus’ recent Reep past.
Fair enough. It lets accusations stand whereas a quick call to the office would settle the issue if any of the accusations have a factual basis independent of elected leaders opinions.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
I can't believe in 2022 we're still concerned about the opinions of a female office seeker's husband. If SHE had a tattoo with a Confederate flag tattoo, fair game, but even in context here, it sounds like a dumb 16-year-old doing dumb 16-year-old things.
My wife and I have a few different political opinions. And she's smarter, younger, and more-accomplished than me -- she shouldn't be held to what I believe. OTOH, I will ride her coattails as far as I can.
Great op ed, Mark, raising important questions.
And to those who dismiss it based on drawing supposed equivalencies with other stuff: try hard to expand your thinking beyond binary choices. The real world is filled with shades of gray and, while frustrating to have to deal with that, it’s part of being a critical thinking adult. The good news is one can get better at it with practice.
Unfortunately, Mr. Simon, when you have folks calling Larry Elder the Black face of white supremacy, or folks bringing up long past tweets as reasons to cancel people, or folks making up a Russian dossier to discredit someone, it appears anything goes when it comes to politics. It’s too late to put the genie back in the bottle so we’ll all have to get used to it, and as in the past, separate the wheat from the chaff from their actions. In the case of candidates that have no actions, we may need to take the risk of getting burned and then dealing with voter remorse. To wit, Kevin Mullin – as it appears Mr. Mullin is beholden to special interests more than his constituents.
Party affiliation history of all registered voters is open to public from the elections office. What does asking a few prominent local Democrats about candidates' reregistration have to do with anything?
Let me suggest you re-read that section of the column. I asked because it makes no difference to them if someone was a Republican if they want to be a Democrat now and Bolanos wants to make an issue of Corpus’ recent Reep past.
Fair enough. It lets accusations stand whereas a quick call to the office would settle the issue if any of the accusations have a factual basis independent of elected leaders opinions.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.