On a recent trip to Utah, we traveled through several national parks — Zion, Capitol Reef, Bryce Canyon and Arches. We also went to Natural Bridges National Monument, extremely interesting albeit not that exciting.
If your goal is to look at some interesting rock formations, then the trip is for you. Everywhere you go there is a ton of neat stuff and good hikes as well. It also provides some context.
Case in point: At Arches, the formations there are part of the Etrada Sandstone from the Jurassic period of about 180 million to 140 million years ago. That was in the Mesozoic Era, which spanned 240 million to 65 million years ago, which is a crazy long time ago. The salt bed there was formed when a sea flowed into the area and evaporated around 300 million years ago. When you look at the arches, and everything else there sticking out in such a cool manner, you are seeing where younger rock eroded away. A sense of awe about the passage of time is a common feeling, I’m sure. Still, the arches at Arches are relative babes when it comes to rock formations.
The natural bridges at Natural Bridges are different than the arches at Arches in a couple of different ways. First, natural bridges are formed by the penetration of water, otherwise known as erosion. Arches are formed when the softer and younger rock around them erodes sooner than the harder rock, which I kind of covered before. But the natural bridge formations are part of the Cedar Mesa Sandstone in the Permian period in the Paleozoic Era, which was about 240 million to 570 million years ago. That’s some old erosion. Most of the natural bridges are in canyons, so you look down upon them until you hike down. The feeling you are looking at rock formations from so long ago can be mind-numbing.
If that isn’t enough, you can think about the eras periods before, like the Cambrian and Precambrian. Those eras are super interesting only because of the discovery of the Burgess Shale in Canada, which showed evidence of blooming life that didn’t evolve in the typical trajectory we think of when we think of evolution. There, we can think of the cone of increasing diversity, in that some species just didn’t make it, but could have, and that evolution is not necessarily linear.
That’s a lot to think about when scoping out some old rocks. But it brings to mind the Holocene Era, or human era — when we are talking about the last 12,000 years or so. That marks the very tip of our existence, the historical record as it is. There is evidence of hominids using tools about 3 million years ago, but the general consensus is that humans have been around for about 200,000 years at most. And given the estimated age of the planet is 4.5 billion years, that means our human history is a mere tick on the timeline. And yet we give ourselves such credit for our inventions and modernity — from the Eiffel Tower, space shuttle and iPhone to Hamlet, sous vide and jazz.
When many talk about the changes we are seeing, it’s important to consider the context. The Holocene Era began with the glacial retreat of the Pleistocene Era, often referred to the Ice Age, which was from about 2.6 million years ago to about 12,000 years ago, when the Holocene Era began. We are in an interglacial period, meaning we are between ice ages, yet remnants of the previous era exist in our ice caps. They will eventually melt and our seas are estimated to rise about 450 feet — with us or without us.
Don’t take that as a fatalistic statement that we have nothing to do with climate change. We do. Or, that there is nothing we can do. There is. Our use of fuels based on the fossils of dead animals from older eras is hastening the change. We should do what we can to slow it. Yet, the caps will melt with or without us, and it’s a bit narcissistic to think we have the ability to change the ages of the world just as the trilobites of the Cambrian explosion had no way to stall the end of their era.
However, the urge is strong for all species to survive and thrive; and that is what calls on so many to do all we can to ensure the safety and stability of newer generations of humans, no matter how young our species may be in the grander scale. Today, on Earth Day, our role on the planet is certainly something to consider.
Jon Mays is the editor in chief of the Daily Journal. He can be reached at jon@smdailyjournal.com. Follow Jon on Twitter @jonmays.
(4) comments
Happy Earth Day, Jon
I don't often disagree with your op-ed pieces and today is no exception. Thanks for a down to earth (sorry) and sensible look at the future of our planet. I have said many times in these pages we MUST... not can or should... we must be better stewards of the only home we've got. So, Happy flat Earth Day... with apologies to Jorg.
Thanks also for the report on Utah's parks. I have been mulling over making a motorcycle trip that way again and now I'm inspired to do so. I've trekked US 50 through southern Utah maybe a half dozen times and the scenery is just beautiful.
Back to the environment... 1,000,000 people die from air pollution annually in China, and mortality in the US caused from air pollution is estimated at about 100,000. Even though we cannot force the CCP to clean up their act, we must do what we can here and now. Let's put aside the doomers screaming "the sky is falling!" and the naysayers screaming "hoax!" back at them. Enough. There's a lot of work to be done. Pew Research reported that two-thirds of adults surveyed believe the government is not doing enough to prevent harm to our environment. We should be able to find a place to start somewhere between the positions espoused by the greenies and the deniers.
Remember the predictions made in the 1970s about how over population and pollution would end life on Earth as we know it before Y2K? Predictions made by "experts" in their field... Those predictions were just about as accurate as the futuristic world created by Woody Allen in his movie "Sleeper" from the same era.
Finally, I would like to share a positive story about that very first Earth Day in 1970 that no one predicted. My HS debate partner, Tom Reardon, was smitten with a co-ed who wanted to start a campus ecology club inspired by Earth Day in 1970. Lots of students were interested, and Tom became the club's VP to get close to the club's founder. Ah, puppy love! Unfortunately for Tom, there was no romance. However, a seed was planted.
Tom is now a world renowned agro-economist with accomplishments and published works too numerous to list here. He advises developing countries around the globe concerning how to best feed their people. Lots of seeds getting planted. It looks like Tom's first real learning experience in taking care of ourselves by taking care of our planet just may have come from joining a high school club honoring the first Earth Day. We can only hope that others will seek the same path.
Mr. Mays, thanks for sharing your trip and the geologic history of various parks. I’m not sure if parks are still offering ranger hikes (most times, ranger-guided but sometimes from volunteers) but if people have the time, they’re well worth it. Some parks, such as Arches NP, (used to, not sure of now) provide hikes off the main trails (such as the Fiery Furnace hike) and those are even more enjoyable as the guides include show and tell exhibits along with their talks. Happy Earth Day and continue to enjoy those parks!
Here here! 🍻
🍺
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.