As a Jewish child growing up in the shadow of the Holocaust and the McCarthy era, the son of a union leader, and as a closeted young gay man who endured watching service members accused of being LGBTQ disappear from my units, German pastor Martin Niemöller’s poem “First They Came” has always resonated with me. As memorialized by the U.S. Holocaust Museum, it reads:
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.
Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University, was on her way to dinner to break her Ramadan fast when she was surrounded by hooded people in what looked like a kidnapping. Her backpack and phone were forcibly taken and, when a passerby tried to intervene, one of the hooded people said “we’re police.” The passerby responded “You don’t look like the police. Why are your faces covered?” Badges were flashed, the woman was handcuffed and rushed to a nearby unmarked vehicle. They were federal agents. Her alleged crime? Writing a student newspaper op-ed about the university’s response to student protests of the Hamas/Israel war (bit.ly/3RNtIIR). Lately, pro-Palestinian sentiment is being labeled, by some, as antisemitism and supporting Hamas. The punishment for her op-ed: her student visa revoked and she was whisked off to a Louisiana jail, pending deportation.
Recommended for you
Disturbing video of her arrest went viral (bit.ly/43TvD66). Twenty-seven Jewish organizations, perhaps with the First They Came poem in mind, filed an amicus brief, reading in part “Arresting, detaining, and potentially deporting Ozturk does not assist in eradicating antisemitism. Nor was that the government’s apparent purpose. The government instead appears to be exploiting Jewish Americans’ legitimate concerns about antisemitism as a pretext for undermining core pillars of American democracy, the rule of law, and the fundamental rights of free speech and academic debate on which this nation was built.”
Indeed. The State Department and the Department of Homeland Security are scouring social media and other communications to ferret out content they can use to deny entry to incoming visitors and arrest, jail, and deport those already here on various types of visas. As of March 31, hundreds of student visas, including those of students at Stanford University, have been revoked.
Yes, our government has the right to revoke people’s visas and deport people but why should someone, who hasn’t been accused of any crime, be held in a jail cell hundreds of miles from where she was living? Why not give her notice of the revocation and an opportunity to appeal. While awaiting a decision, an ankle monitor can prevent her from absconding. If her appeal fails, let her leave. There are planes going everywhere every day.
Could you ever imagine a 21st Century United States where writing an op-ed in a student newspaper got you placed in handcuffs and thrown in jail? Beyond Rumeysa Ozturk, there’s Kilmar Abrego, a man government lawyers admitted was mistakenly renditioned from Maryland to a Salvadoran “Terrorism Confinement Center.” Despite the Supreme Court saying our government should facilitate his return, he continues to be trapped there. Joining him is a gay Venezuelan baker, sent to that same jail because he had an Autism Awareness tattoo. How about the mom and three children taken from a farm in upstate New York and thrown into detention 1,800 miles away in Texas for 10 days, only released after their community and governor intervened?
Ozturk, Abrego, the gay baker, that mom and her three children didn’t pose any danger. They, like anyone with their feet on our soil, are protected by our Constitution and have the right to due process. Yes, there are people who do present a danger to us, like convicted gang members, murderers, rapists and other violent criminals. Our government has the right, and responsibility, to protect us from them, but it should do so while always upholding our Constitution and affording everyone due process and judicial review.
First they came for a Turkish student, then the father seeking asylum and the gay baker, then a mom and her three kids … and the president said, on camera, that he wants to deport “homegrown” citizens too. Might my column offend him? Speak out now or … .
Craig Wiesner is the co-owner of Reach And Teach, a book, toy and cultural gift shop on San Carlos Avenue in San Carlos. Follow Craig: craigwiesner.bsky.social.
Craig - you are a well-meaning person but you seem to make it convenient to lump very diverse issues that by any measure are unrelated. All of us are fully aware of what happened in Nazi Germany and the the countries that they occupied. Our neighbors in the Netherlands were Holocaust survivors. Their plight in no way is even remotely comparable to this political ploy by this disgraceful senator what happened to the Jews. This deported guy, who you conveniently not mention by name, would be akin to a KAPO. He is a criminal who should have been deported a long time ago but was allowed to stay here because he would have been done in by a rival gang in El Salvador. After all of the years that you claim to understand the culture of some in Central America, let me assure you that the population is not monolithic. Women in the underclass, the vast majority, do not marry and are subject the whims of their male partners. Their economic status and protection is almost 100% dependent on their male partners. As a frequent visitor to beautiful El Salvador, from my discussions with our domestic help and other women who work in menial positions, I gathered that abuse and incest are rampant and considered par for the course. The interview with Van Hollen's new hero's wife showed the pain on her face. She has no choice or would face severe consequences. What strikes me more than anything else is that the leftist women in our government, who have already abandoned women sport safey in favor of male participation, is that they have not rallied to the support of this tragic wife and provide for her safe future. And all of this for politics and vote garnering. Shame on them. The hypocrisy of the left is again in full view.
Thanks, Mr. Wiesner, for repeating the Democrat playbook narrative on supporting criminals rather than American citizens. As usual, you’ve included a few cherry-picked examples which do not reflect the overall situation. Let’s contrast the supposed rights you claim/make up for criminals crossing our borders with the rights of American citizens to be protected from invaders to our country. Last I checked, crossing the border illegally is a crime. ICYMI, the Laken Riley Act was passed with the assistance of a number of Democrat Representatives and Democrat Senators. Apparently, they’ve spoken out and aren’t too worried about your concerns. BTW, it should be noted that recent polls show folks continue to support our (yes, our) great President Trump’s efforts to remove invaders to our country. Trump has already done a great job to date, even with the constitutional crises caused by activist judges infringing on Executive powers.
The president takes an oath to preserve, protect, and defect our Constitution. The fifth amendment says that no one in the U.S., non-citizens included, shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." If they are criminals, fine, send them to jail, but never without due process. I remember when Republicans were never seen without a copy of the Constitution. Sadly many seem not to have read it. If they are certain that these people are criminals, they should be able to prove it in a court of law. The courts did not create the crisis, they are simply not silent when they see it.
jesg - if a person is here illegally and his or her whereabouts are not known by the authorities, how is the fifth amendment applicable? So, if one sneaks in here without our permission, that person should now be able to take advantage of our due process while ignoring it by coming here? Where were you when most provisions of our Constitution were defiled by the Biden gang? Suddenly, the rule of law must be applied again? The Supreme Court will need to clarify but it is clear that our Constitution did not envision the onslaught of illegal entry.
Craig, you asked “Might my column offend him? Speak out now or … .”
Well, Trump isn’t one who reads more than a single line or two, poorly schooled as he is, but someone might point it out to him, - even someone from our own, better educated, community, I’m ashamed to admit. He is already going after Rachel Maddow for speaking the truth, so you may be next in line!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
Craig - you are a well-meaning person but you seem to make it convenient to lump very diverse issues that by any measure are unrelated. All of us are fully aware of what happened in Nazi Germany and the the countries that they occupied. Our neighbors in the Netherlands were Holocaust survivors. Their plight in no way is even remotely comparable to this political ploy by this disgraceful senator what happened to the Jews. This deported guy, who you conveniently not mention by name, would be akin to a KAPO. He is a criminal who should have been deported a long time ago but was allowed to stay here because he would have been done in by a rival gang in El Salvador. After all of the years that you claim to understand the culture of some in Central America, let me assure you that the population is not monolithic. Women in the underclass, the vast majority, do not marry and are subject the whims of their male partners. Their economic status and protection is almost 100% dependent on their male partners. As a frequent visitor to beautiful El Salvador, from my discussions with our domestic help and other women who work in menial positions, I gathered that abuse and incest are rampant and considered par for the course. The interview with Van Hollen's new hero's wife showed the pain on her face. She has no choice or would face severe consequences. What strikes me more than anything else is that the leftist women in our government, who have already abandoned women sport safey in favor of male participation, is that they have not rallied to the support of this tragic wife and provide for her safe future. And all of this for politics and vote garnering. Shame on them. The hypocrisy of the left is again in full view.
Super column Craig, as usual but probably among your best. Just perfect!!!
Cheers all
Thanks, Mr. Wiesner, for repeating the Democrat playbook narrative on supporting criminals rather than American citizens. As usual, you’ve included a few cherry-picked examples which do not reflect the overall situation. Let’s contrast the supposed rights you claim/make up for criminals crossing our borders with the rights of American citizens to be protected from invaders to our country. Last I checked, crossing the border illegally is a crime. ICYMI, the Laken Riley Act was passed with the assistance of a number of Democrat Representatives and Democrat Senators. Apparently, they’ve spoken out and aren’t too worried about your concerns. BTW, it should be noted that recent polls show folks continue to support our (yes, our) great President Trump’s efforts to remove invaders to our country. Trump has already done a great job to date, even with the constitutional crises caused by activist judges infringing on Executive powers.
The president takes an oath to preserve, protect, and defect our Constitution. The fifth amendment says that no one in the U.S., non-citizens included, shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." If they are criminals, fine, send them to jail, but never without due process. I remember when Republicans were never seen without a copy of the Constitution. Sadly many seem not to have read it. If they are certain that these people are criminals, they should be able to prove it in a court of law. The courts did not create the crisis, they are simply not silent when they see it.
jesg - if a person is here illegally and his or her whereabouts are not known by the authorities, how is the fifth amendment applicable? So, if one sneaks in here without our permission, that person should now be able to take advantage of our due process while ignoring it by coming here? Where were you when most provisions of our Constitution were defiled by the Biden gang? Suddenly, the rule of law must be applied again? The Supreme Court will need to clarify but it is clear that our Constitution did not envision the onslaught of illegal entry.
Craig, you asked “Might my column offend him? Speak out now or … .”
Well, Trump isn’t one who reads more than a single line or two, poorly schooled as he is, but someone might point it out to him, - even someone from our own, better educated, community, I’m ashamed to admit. He is already going after Rachel Maddow for speaking the truth, so you may be next in line!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.