During the dot-com boom, there was so much money flowing into California coffers that the administration of then governor Gray Davis was looking for ideas on what to do with its stacks of cash. One idea was to reduce the vehicle license fee to one-third of what it was. It was intended to be temporary, and a gift of sorts to average Californians who would appreciate some extra cash in their pocket. Another idea was to provide teachers bonuses of up to $25,000 for reaching a certain higher measurement in their students’ test scores.
I was reminded of that $25,000 bonus idea recently when I heard about an idea to provide “premium pay” for certain state employees deemed essential with a cap of … you guessed it, $25,000.
I am also waiting for all sorts of ideas from lobbyists, special interest groups and legislators themselves for the $150 billion in cash the state is receiving as part of the latest COVID relief package. Combined with the estimated $14.3 billion in state General Fund surplus announced this week, and we have the makings of all sorts of pie-in-the-sky ideas.
One thing to consider, however, is that we still have a growing debt. In 2019, not too long ago, California’s wall of debt was estimated to be $362.9 billion. There is also about $93 billion in unfunded pension obligations and about $85.6 billion in unfunded health retiree benefits. That’s something right?
Much of that obligation originated in those halcyon days of the dot-com boom when people talked about the stock market just going up forever with the Dow Jones Industrial Average hitting 30,000 (well, it did it eventually). At the time, it was about 10,000 and government officials believed its rate of return would remain about 16% to 24% and that meant they wouldn’t have to contribute to retirement packages since they were invested in the market. Retirement packages increased for police and firefighters and spread to other government workers. Now, I’m not here for commentary on whether they deserve it. It just is. And it cost us money in the long term as people retired early and lived longer.
Recommended for you
Another thing to consider is that there are economic cycles, and try as we might to prop up and keep fueled and twist and ease, eventually what goes up comes down. That’s what happened with the dot-com bust and that’s what helped ease out Gray Davis. People say it was deregulation and the rolling blackouts but it really was his proposal to triple the DMV fee (or what some would call return to prior levels). People weren’t keen on that, and away he went.
While we got Arnold Schwarzenegger as our governor, then Jerry Brown and now Gavin Newsom, little has been done to fix our state’s reliance on capital gains for a huge source of revenue. That reliance means we have ups and downs with the stock market, and while we have about $20 billion in our rainy fund established by Proposition 2 in 2014, it’s a drop in the bucket, so to speak, on our larger overall debt.
So let’s see, about $363 billion in debt, a budget surplus of $14.3 billion, $150 billion in stimulus funds and about $20 billion in emergency reserves. I wouldn’t head to Vegas, would you? I certainly wouldn’t start thinking about cash bonuses or single-payer health care or any other expensive proposal. I would be thinking the market could drop at any time and I should probably bolster my reserves, and thank my lucky stars we have a small surplus to ease any ills.
Stability is key to any budget. And the ledger never lies. While the American Rescue Plan Act had lots in it to help people who legitimately need it, the Biden administration is already talking about new taxes and inflation is a genuine concern. Here in California, we have seen lots of benefits from both stimulus acts and we can provide some very real short-term relief to get people back on their feet. Let’s do that. Let’s not commit to expensive new programs that require ongoing funding. We simply don’t have that kind of money.
This year’s budget surplus, while great, is a sign of our flawed taxation and budget process. Our state benefits when the stock market goes up and suffers greatly when it goes down. So we should continue to prepare for when it does. After all, Newsom surely doesn’t want to share the same fate as Gray Davis.
Jon Mays is the editor in chief of the Daily Journal. He can be reached at jon@smdailyjournal.com. Follow Jon on Twitter @jonmays.
Mr. Mays, as you’ve ably pointed out, there is no surplus. Accounting shenanigans and lazy news reporting from lamestream outlets attempt to show a rosy picture, but people are well aware that any of us would show a budget surplus if we decided to remove long term debts off our books. Fortunately, unlike the state, individuals can easily move out of CA and rid ourselves of state obligations.
With governments around the world in more debt than ever and it would be a great idea for California, who does not control the currency, to set a trend of going debt-free. I would suggest four parts.
One is to review all programs to see where efficiency can be gained through deployment of new technology. Two, refocus the state government's role on fulfilling needs of its citizens rather than the needs of its employees. In this thought there should be no such thing as a state union as any state worker grievances should be possible to deal with at the polling booth. Three, support and pass in this state something like HR1 which would get corporate money out of politics and address the various drags on timely legislation.
Last, and though it sounds like a meme, set aside 10 billion to be stored in Bitcoin to be held for at least 10 years. In the next twenty years, we're going to see a shift from debt-based money to sound money and while the debt will be inflated away, those in the strongest position will have established savings in sound money.
The vehicle license fee is an interesting one because the change still complicates both school district and city finances today. Since the VLF was an important source of city funding, the state promised to make up the loss to cities by taking away some money from school districts and transferring it to cities. If you want to see something truly weird, look up the California "triple flip." That was a system where the state sold bonds to cover funding problems and then transferred money around among several different entities to cover the bond payments and make the state budget appear balanced. One part of the state finance problem is the multiple different budget transfers created by the state over time to cover different school, city, and county needs. Those transfers work a little like "kiting checks" used to work for some scammers.
Mr. Mays – belated congratulations on making the March 26 headline summary on the Pension Tsunami site. A recommended site to read pension-related articles from across America.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
Mr. Mays, as you’ve ably pointed out, there is no surplus. Accounting shenanigans and lazy news reporting from lamestream outlets attempt to show a rosy picture, but people are well aware that any of us would show a budget surplus if we decided to remove long term debts off our books. Fortunately, unlike the state, individuals can easily move out of CA and rid ourselves of state obligations.
With governments around the world in more debt than ever and it would be a great idea for California, who does not control the currency, to set a trend of going debt-free. I would suggest four parts.
One is to review all programs to see where efficiency can be gained through deployment of new technology. Two, refocus the state government's role on fulfilling needs of its citizens rather than the needs of its employees. In this thought there should be no such thing as a state union as any state worker grievances should be possible to deal with at the polling booth. Three, support and pass in this state something like HR1 which would get corporate money out of politics and address the various drags on timely legislation.
Last, and though it sounds like a meme, set aside 10 billion to be stored in Bitcoin to be held for at least 10 years. In the next twenty years, we're going to see a shift from debt-based money to sound money and while the debt will be inflated away, those in the strongest position will have established savings in sound money.
The vehicle license fee is an interesting one because the change still complicates both school district and city finances today. Since the VLF was an important source of city funding, the state promised to make up the loss to cities by taking away some money from school districts and transferring it to cities. If you want to see something truly weird, look up the California "triple flip." That was a system where the state sold bonds to cover funding problems and then transferred money around among several different entities to cover the bond payments and make the state budget appear balanced. One part of the state finance problem is the multiple different budget transfers created by the state over time to cover different school, city, and county needs. Those transfers work a little like "kiting checks" used to work for some scammers.
What will the reaction be if home property tax is raised?
Mr. Mays – belated congratulations on making the March 26 headline summary on the Pension Tsunami site. A recommended site to read pension-related articles from across America.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.