The San Bruno Park School District is looking for support on two ballot measures this November, one establishing term limits for board members and the other a parcel tax to help update curriculum and technology, and increase teacher salaries. 

Measure X is looking to establish an annual tax of $68 per parcel for a period of eight years, generating $730,000 annually. 

Recommended for you

ana@smdailyjournal.com

(65) 344-5200 ext. 106

Tags

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Terence Y

I recommend everyone vote NO on Measure X. It’s obvious that San Bruno is not fiscally responsible. Remember, this is the San Bruno who wasted taxpayer money on holding cease-fire resolution discussions. This is the San Bruno who paid for a parcel tax study with taxpayer money to, of all things, study increasing taxes on residents. This is the San Bruno who received $70 million, wasting 70+% on a recreation center that will likely serve a small portion of San Brunans (Bruno-ans?). This is the San Bruno who has blown $4 million to get folks to pay for downtown parking. Lots of money wasted that wasn’t used for updating curriculum and technology, and increasing teacher salaries.

Vote NO on this Measure and if you have voter remorse, wait for the next election cycle and you’ll see another measure looking for more of your money. Money that likely will mostly, if not all, go to paying ever increasing pensions and benefits. Once you agree to this parcel tax, chances are, San Bruno will want to extend it into the next century.

Bigslow

While I agree with voting NO on this measure, and agree that I feel San Bruno has wastes a ton of money on thing that should have gone to infrastructure, and that the city councils seem a little incompetent in regards to squandering improvements to San Bruno Cable (CityNet), I will push back on the Recreation Center as I have been using the facility since it opened to residents and have to say that each day it is getting busier and busier. I am worried thought that the current city council will not use the money effectively, and also worried that they will not maintain the Recreation Center.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here