SACRAMENTO — Embattled Secretary of State Kevin Shelley agreed Thursday to testify Feb. 3 before the legislative committee investigating his use of federal election funds, removing the threat of a subpoena compelling his appearance.
Shelley met a 10 a.m. deadline set by the committee's chairwoman, Assemblywoman Nicole Parra, D-Hanford, to confirm his appearance before the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. Parra said she would seek a subpoena to assure his presence if he did not agree to come voluntarily.
Shelley made the commitment in a letter and telephone call to Parra, aides said.
"He looks forward to participating," said his spokeswoman Caren Daniels-Meade.
Parra described a "cordial conversation" with Shelley, saying he agreed to testify with no conditions or limits on what questions he would take or answers he would provide.
Parra said she wants Shelley to testify under oath, and Shelley agreed later Thursday.
"If that's what the committee wants, yes," said Daniels-Meade.
The committee, which is investigating Shelley's use of federal Help America Vote Act funds, met 7 1/2 hours Monday to consider a December state audit that charged his office with mishandling millions of dollars.
State Auditor Elaine Howle told the committee that Shelley's office poorly managed portions of $46 million in election funds with "disregard for proper controls and poor oversight."
The auditor alleged numerous instances of money steered to consultants who attended partisan political events and to contractors without competitive bidding. Many performed services that had little relationship to the election funds' purpose, the audit said.
Recommended for you
The audit also revealed late payments to counties to upgrade their voting systems, costing them thousands of dollars in lost interest income.
California is expected to receive approximately $350 million of the nearly $4 billion in funds earmarked by Congress in 2002 to modernize U.S. voting systems in the wake of the 2000 presidential election debacle in Florida. The money is intended to replace paper and lever voting with electronic voting systems and improve voter turnout with education and outreach.
Shelley's special counsel, Tony Miller, told committee members under oath Monday that the problems with handling the money were "old news."
Miller said the secretary of state's office had hired a Florida management consultant, MGT of America, to tighten internal controls and has established new procedures to monitor how it spends the money. Miller said Shelley aims to make California a model for the nation in spending the federal funds.
Parra said Miller's testimony led to new questions that committee members want to ask Shelley.
Shelley also faces a federal and state investigation over $125,000 contributed to his 2002 campaign from recipients of $168,000 in state funds he steered as a state assemblyman toward a San Francisco neighborhood center that was never built.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.