Mark Kremer

San Mateo native Mark Kremer, 56, was struck and killed by a vehicle on Fashion Island Boulevard in San Mateo Feb. 8.

A 56-year-old pedestrian was struck and killed by a vehicle on Fashion Island Boulevard in San Mateo around 9 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 8.

Mark Kremer grew up in San Mateo and was described by friends as artistic, social and always willing to lend a hand.

Recommended for you

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(7) comments

joebob91

Please sign this letter to the SM City Council asking them to stop the carnage on SM streets:

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/stop-the-pedestrian-carnage-in-san-mateo

easygerd

Time for Rob, Adam, Lisa, Danielle, Nicole to practice their 'Thoughts and Prayer" faces.

The city rolls out every single million dollar marketing campaign known to mankind: "Vision Zero", "Transportation Equity", "Complete Streets", "Safe-Routes-To-School", "Transit Oriented Development", "Sustainable Transportation", ... to mask the fact that all real money goes to car-centric investments.

But taking down the Humboldt Street Bike Lanes shows us what they really think about their responsibilities towards residents.

Terence Y

eGerd – TBot here. I believe taking down the Humboldt Street Bike Lanes is showing us how “they” think about their responsibilities towards residents. The residents most affected by bike lanes.

easygerd

TBot - Streets are made for Transportation - only woke, socialist snowflakes would disagree with that notion.

The municipal code does allow residents to store their own vehicle on their own property.

Did you know that one of the most vocal residents for parking has violated the municipal code by transferring her garage spots into livable space? This landlord can now rent out at a higher price and have the public pay for it. Another huge government program that needs to be slashed.

We tax payers expect that streets are used for various transportation options: lanes for pedestrians (some call them sidewalks), lanes for bicycles, lanes for buses, rail lines, and of course for cars and trucks.

Terence Y

eGerd – TBot here. So you’re back to calling people names because they don’t agree with you? I would have thought you were better than using a divisive Democrat tactic. Surprise, nobody cares what they’re being called because every “insult” has been overused to the point that they’re just words which show the character of those calling people names than recipients of the attack. That being said, I agree streets are made for transportation. And cars and buses and trucks and bicycles can use them. If you’re going to attempt to create special lanes for them, why not lanes for tandem bikes, or electric bikes? And for sidewalks, how about sidewalks for dog walkers, or people walkers, or skateboarders, or people talking on phones? Why not sidewalks specifically for biological males, biological females, none of the above?

easygerd

Good idea about having more lane splits. The correct way of doing that is actually by speed and by purpose and by priority: active and public transportation should have precedence in planning since they improve health and happiness of a city. They are way less damaging than pollution from private cars and private car storage.

-1-5mph: well done wide sidewalks - should be an ADA minimum requirement. Dog walkers, nannies, baby strollers,

-5-15mph: different modes of transportation - here we would expect children and senior citizens on bicycles. But could be runners, skateboarders, scooters, e-scooters.

-15-25mph: that could be a shared road environment. - this of course for cars, but also "vehicular cyclists" or fast e-bikes. Since they can go at car speeds - they can mix and match.

- >25mph: should not be necessary in residential areas within cities

- larger arteries like El Camino should have bus lanes to make sure SamTrans can stay out of congestion.

Basically in most areas you can deal with 3 lanes (1 sidewalk, 1 bike lane, 1 driving lane per direction).

-----------

But this article is about a person being killed while crossing the street. So the big question is how can you separate different speeds at intersections? And the answer to that aren't different lanes but you separate them by time. That can only be done with real traffic lights for pedestrians. No right-on-red, no hawk signals, no yellow flashing beacon - real separation. Cars need to stop.

Dirk van Ulden

easygerd - all of those vapid measures provide political capital. A poor slob killed on an the road does not help their political agenda. May he rest peace.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here