San Mateo County has reached an $8 million settlement with a former sheriff’s deputy and SWAT team member who filed a sexual harassment and discrimination lawsuit in 2022, alleging she was sexually assaulted by a former SWAT team leader and discriminated against by the department for years.
Carryn Barker's attorneys Zak Franklin and Julianna Zalinski said in a statement Friday that the settlement came before the lawsuit's September trial date, when a judge was to decide whether Franklin could depose San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus about her possible role in the alleged harassment. A spokesperson for the department said the sheriff had no knowledge of the alleged harassment and wasn't sheriff at the time it allegedly took place.
Barker’s lawyers said that during almost two years of litigation, documents and depositions of 21 current and former employees of the Sheriff’s Office revealed that Barker — who they said is a UC Berkeley graduate, Medal of Honor recipient and only the second woman to qualify for the county’s SWAT team — was subjected to sexual harassment by her SWAT team supervisor, Andre Moniot.
Barker alleged the harassment and discrimination began shortly after Barker joined the SWAT team in 2018 and included Moniot making frequent vulgar comments about Barker’s body, telling Barker and others that he wanted to have sex with her, instructing Barker to wear revealing clothing during team workouts, touching Barker inappropriately, requiring Barker to ride alone with him to and from SWAT functions, and eventually assaulting Barker at a SWAT team gathering in October 2021.
Barker’s attorneys said the Sheriff’s Office employees testified they reported Moniot’s sexual harassment of Barker to multiple high-ranking officers in the department, but they did nothing to investigate the allegations or protect Barker until after she filed the lawsuit.
The attorneys also said testimony revealed as of early 2021 — several months before Moniot allegedly sexually assaulted Barker — at least five high-ranking officers were aware Moniot was sexually harassing Barker but failed to intervene.
They said Moniot testified he wouldn’t have sexually assaulted Barker if anyone in a leadership position told him Barker and others reported his sexual harassment of her.
Recommended for you
Barker’s lawyers said the department didn’t investigate the allegations until a retiring high-level officer notified the internal affairs department in August 2022.
Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Gretchen Spiker said the department “is aware of the settlement relating to incidents that occurred years ago under the previous sheriff.”
“Sheriff Corpus is committed to improving the culture of the Sheriff’s Office by prioritizing accountability and implementing higher standards — setting the tone that misconduct will not be tolerated under her watch,” Spiker said. “Because this is a lawsuit involving a personnel matter, we are unable to comment any further.”
Barker took a leave of absence from the SWAT team in September 2022 to avoid having to attend the same SWAT team function where Moniot allegedly assaulted her the previous year and where Moniot was expected to be in attendance that year.
Barker resigned from the SWAT team in November 2022 after the county still failed to do anything to protect Barker from Moniot, according to Barker’s attorneys. That was the same month she filed her lawsuit.
Barker’s attorneys said when the lawsuit became public, members of the SWAT team threatened to resign if Moniot wasn’t immediately put on a leave of absence. They also said other women allegedly victimized by men at the Sheriff’s Office also contacted Barker and her attorneys to share their own experiences of sexual harassment and discrimination.
Note to readers:This story has been changed to reflect that the current sheriff had no knowledge of the situation.
And yet another excellent example of why we need independent civilian oversight of the Sheriff's office.
Please pay attention, County Supervisors--this is important! Under the former sheriff, deputies facing harassment or discrimination had no where to turn. Having a better sheriff in town is only the smaller piece to the fix.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
And yet another excellent example of why we need independent civilian oversight of the Sheriff's office.
Please pay attention, County Supervisors--this is important! Under the former sheriff, deputies facing harassment or discrimination had no where to turn. Having a better sheriff in town is only the smaller piece to the fix.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.