Officials favor further exploring upgrading San Bruno Cable’s system, under an assumption that offering improved service available through a fiber network is key for preserving the city’s unique service.
The San Bruno City Council agreed to seek more information regarding the next steps and financial implications of replacing the city’s copper cable with a fiber connection, according to a video of the Tuesday, April 10, meeting.
But the endeavor expected to cost roughly $10 million generates concerns for a councilmember wishing to assure there is adequate opportunity for return on the sizable investment.
Councilman Michael Salazar said while he appreciates the rarity of the city’s owned and operated cable network, he also harbors reservations about its viability.
“I’m not against doing it, I’m just really concerned that long term our ability to keep this going is there,” he said, noting the system’s struggle to generate revenue comparable to the amounts when it was launched nearly 50 years ago.
San Bruno is the only municipality remaining in California offering citywide cable, according to muninetworks.org, a website tracking the services.
Those who more passionately advocate for the upgrade exploration cite the city’s rare asset in their justification for preserving it.
“If we do nothing, the whole system will decline. We will be stuck with the debt that we already have with little chance of replacing it. And the citizens of San Bruno will be stuck without our San Bruno Cable, and that alone should make us pause and think really hard about doing this,” said Councilwoman Irene O’Connell.
Vice Mayor Laura Davis shared a similar perspective.
“We have a great thing in San Bruno, and I would hate to lose that,” he said.
The system offering internet and television service was established as a means of earning money for the city’s general fund but, as competition and costs have increased over time, San Bruno Cable’s earning power has diminished. To that extent, the system’s operating deficit has grown to nearly $10 million over the last decade.
Officials seemingly agree the only way to preserve the service is to upgrade to fiber, which would grant higher internet connectivity speeds. With television subscription revenue declining across the city, most councilmembers seemed focused on improving San Bruno Cable’s online capabilities.
According to a consultant’s report, officials should expect revenue generated by an upgraded system would cover the cost of establishing the fiber network over a period spanning between 10 and 30 years. Officials have suggested previously that a tax measure may be necessary to address the initial cost of the work.
The recoupment expectation is borne from the recent fiber upgrade offered at the Shelter Creek complex, where the improved system’s availability generated disproportionate additional revenue compared to the rest of the city, according to the report.
Salazar showed tepid enthusiasm for an attempt to extrapolate the complex’s revenue gains across the city, noting the perils of comparing a specific community to San Bruno’s general population.
“The numbers are not that compelling,” he said of the Shelter Creek projections, while also noting the presence of competitors such as AT&T, which are eyeing fiber connectivity in San Bruno.
Most councilmembers though were more enthusiastic about the opportunity, and strongly supported analyzing the financial next steps surrounding an upgrade.
“I’m in favor of moving forward and I strongly suggest we move swiftly,” said Councilman Marty Medina.
Davis too said officials should pursue additional examination, with an understanding that the existing service is inadequate and unsustainable.
“We have to do something. We can’t continue what we are doing,” she said.
Regarding next steps, Mayor Rico Medina encouraged staffers to bring back a detailed fiscal analysis of the project with hopes of making a final decision on the matter down the road. He suggested a study session is in order to grant adequate time for a deeper understanding.
For her part, Davis succinctly illustrated a majority of the City Council’s position.
“We need to get a good analysis of cable in its entirety,” she said.
(4) comments
You don't need to go though comprehensive studies to know that fiber is the future. Once AT&T runs fiber through SB, it will be the death knell of SB Cable (my neighborhood is being wired as I type). I myself will be amongst the first wave to sign up for AT&T Fiber.
As it is reticent to upgrade to meet the needs of current technology, SB Cable will be assigned to the heap of obsolete technologies that make up Mt. Betamax. If you can't keep up, you whither on the vine.
Pouring one out for the homie.
San Bruno is much better off with San Bruno Cable. ATT and other national ISPs will not provide the 2.5/1.5 Gbps speeds, and they abuse their power as the only provider in town. As for how long those speeds will be useful, 10-15 years is a safe estimate. San Bruno Cable should focus more on its Internet services and perhaps expect to re-invest in better network infrastructure 5 years after it's paid for this round of upgrades. Ideally, they would be aware of current adoption of home network technologies and update their offerings in accordance. When 50% of homes have 10 Gbps routers and devices, they might begin offering 10gig service, for example. 10gbps is quite far away, however. In everyday usage, most people have a hard time telling the difference between SATA SSDs (4 gbps) and NVME SSDs (20 gbps) because both are so fast.
I want to live in a city that recognizes the Internet as a public utility in the same category as roads and water. When you have a real problem, you can go to the city council meetings on Tuesdays and talk to real people. I've met them, they're reasonable and generally care about what you care about (seriously, it's nice having that option).
Final note, I think 30 years to recoup the cost is a very conservative estimate.
Totally agree with Onecat. San Bruno should NOT INVEST at the least 10 million for and upgrade. What is this City council thinking?What happens when the technology changes after you have invested all this money. Sell this boondoggle SBC and encourage Comcast to come in to SB. You cannot compete with AT&T, they will undercut your pricing and you will be left with a HUGE debt. BAD INVESTMENT
Just let it die, San Bruno cable is subpar expensive and can't compete with the big boys, let the competition in,. Its had it's run, we need companies with big money that can invest in upgrading the infrastructure,. San Bruno cable is on life support, PULL THE PLUG!!!!!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.