In October 2024, the Peninsula Health Care District quietly killed a senior housing development and wellness services hub, known as the Peninsula Wellness Community.
After scrapping its original plans for a senior housing development and wellness services hub to dismay and frustration from housing advocates, the Peninsula Health Care District is moving forward with a new plan to build affordable housing for seniors.
Founded in 1947, the health care district previously operated Peninsula Hospital in the space where Sutter-owned Mills-Peninsula Medical Center now stands. Since then, the district has used its tax money to purchase nearby property and has been aiming to productively allocate a use for the adjacent 6.4 acres.
Originally, ambitious plans for the property, dubbed the Peninsula Wellness Community, included both market-rate and affordable senior housing units, a community center and a health care hub.
That development idea became financially untenable, per the board, and was killed in October 2024. Now, the PHCD board has issued a request for proposals for a 2-acre, 100% affordable senior housing community project design.
The PHCD was unable to separate project components — residential housing, affordable housing and a medical office space — in the previous design iteration due to its agreement with the developers, Lawrence Cappel, Peninsula Health Care District board chair, said.
Issuing a new RFP for only the affordable housing component of the project is the first step toward creating a financially feasible development, Cappel said, however, he remains hopeful other elements of the wellness center will also come to fruition over time.
“I think the original vision will come forward, maybe not in the same scale as that we had exactly, originally,” he said.
MidPen Housing was originally selected to helm an entirely affordable, 152-unit portion of the project and, in October, was subsequently informed it would not be moving forward. Developers PCB and Generations were slated for other elements of the project, like its market-rate housing and wellness center.
Recommended for you
These developers had expressed frustration around the time and effort that was put into the project over a five-year period. MidPen Housing, for example, put in almost $400,000 in out-of-pocket costs on this plan. The county had also allocated $400,000 in financial resources and 38 project-based vouchers, which have since been returned but were unavailable for other projects for years.
Cappel said he would be happy to see MidPen apply again under the new RFP.
Affordable housing advocates, who had been key to the original inclusion of affordable housing for seniors on the property, were disappointed when the project was scrapped in October.
Evelyn Stivers, Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County executive director, said that she was happy to see the district move forward with new affordable housing plans, though, she remained concerned the health care district wasn’t adequately prepared to helm such a large development.
“I’m so glad that they’re prioritizing housing. I’m so glad that they’re prioritizing affordable housing,” she said. “I hope that if they do get stuck again, that they do reach out, that they don’t see the city or the county as being a competitor or an enemy or taking away their credibility, but that they see the city and the county as essential partners.”
Cappel disputed the idea that PCHD was unequipped to handle the project and maintained that the board was focused on creating affordable housing for San Mateo County’s vulnerable senior population.
“Even though the vision was clear, how to get to that vision sometimes became difficult,” he said. “It’s much more clear now — all five members of the board are very much in tune with the idea of the affordable housing component.”
PHCD resisted any efforts by the community to have affordable housing made part of the original plan, FOR YEARS. The community members were mocked, dismissed, and insulted by some who are still on the Board. Once they couldn't ignore the huge opposition to their plans to have no affordable housing, they finally caved in. Then, after the developers had their plan ready, they dropped it all. With three original members still on the Board, the public has to be skeptical of their competence and commitment. Public land needs to be used for the public good. It should be turned over to the County, and the District dissolved.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
PHCD resisted any efforts by the community to have affordable housing made part of the original plan, FOR YEARS. The community members were mocked, dismissed, and insulted by some who are still on the Board. Once they couldn't ignore the huge opposition to their plans to have no affordable housing, they finally caved in. Then, after the developers had their plan ready, they dropped it all. With three original members still on the Board, the public has to be skeptical of their competence and commitment. Public land needs to be used for the public good. It should be turned over to the County, and the District dissolved.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.