Belmont leaders are contemplating the highest-priority offerings for a new and improved Barrett Community Center, a 75-year-old building constructed on outdated earthquake standards and made for a much smaller population.
The building that houses the current Barrett Community Center, located on Belburn Drive, offers a variety of programs and is also a key source of children’s services, as about 400 to 450 children frequent the location each day. The building previously lived a past life as an elementary school, which the city took over in the 1980s. But the structure, built in the 1950s, is in need of repairs and with that comes additional talks about the need for a centrally located emergency resource center.
Discussions on how to revamp the center began around 2019, though they were sidelined during the pandemic to attend to more urgent issues. But since the end of last year, numerous community discussions, including open houses, have taken place to understand what residents would like to see from the facility in its new state.
In addition to a host of new amenities — which could potentially include a pool, dog park and pickleball courts — a central question is how much the new building should accommodate relief services for residents in the event of an emergency, including natural disaster.
While having a community center with the capacity to offer a range of emergency shelter and services is appealing, Parks and Recreation Director Brigitte Shearer said it also comes with cost tradeoffs.
Recommended for you
“There are some other building code requirements if you name yourself a higher-level shelter … that then drive up the cost of the building, so we are trying that sweet spot where we might have access to some infrastructure funding without having to over-engineer the building,” Shearer said.
Group 4 Architects Principal Jonathan Hartman said the city could plan for a resiliency center, which is scaled down from a full-scale emergency shelter.
“Since those things exist in a different type of capacity elsewhere already, the proposal to date has not been to replicate that level of intensity for this facility,” Hartman said. “A lot of the resiliency centers that we see on the Peninsula that would be similar in context to this have emergency generators that are able to air condition three-quarters of the building, so it becomes a cooling shelter, or different things at different times because it has those extra measures.”
Hartman added that the current center could also remain in operation while the new building is constructed where the soccer fields are situated.
A contributor on Nextdoor reports that a research firm is under contract by Belmont to see what our threshold for additional taxes to finance this boondoggle is. Based on her numbers, each property would be charged $.35 per square foot of assessed space. That would cost me $1,200 per year. Perhaps someone at City Hall can either confirm or deny this proposal.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
A contributor on Nextdoor reports that a research firm is under contract by Belmont to see what our threshold for additional taxes to finance this boondoggle is. Based on her numbers, each property would be charged $.35 per square foot of assessed space. That would cost me $1,200 per year. Perhaps someone at City Hall can either confirm or deny this proposal.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.