Editor,
I want to thank U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff for opposing the misleadingly named “Fix Our Forests Act.” His vote reflects a deep commitment to both environmental protection and democratic values.
Editor,
I want to thank U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff for opposing the misleadingly named “Fix Our Forests Act.” His vote reflects a deep commitment to both environmental protection and democratic values.
This bill would fast-track logging projects under the guise of wildfire prevention, while gutting public participation, skirting environmental laws, and curtailing judicial review. It’s not about fixing forests — it’s about silencing communities and handing power to industry.
That’s why Senator Schiff’s “no” vote matters. He stood up for science-based forest management and the public’s right to be heard. Unfortunately, Sen. Alex Padilla supported the bill — a move that surprised and disappointed many Californians who count on him to champion climate and environmental justice. Supporting a bill that undermines transparency and community input is a step in the wrong direction.
Sen. Schiff’s leadership reminds us that real wildfire resilience doesn’t come from shortcuts or giveaways — it comes from inclusive, evidence-based policy. I’m grateful he had the courage to say no.
Jennifer Normoyle
Hillsborough
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Thanks for your letter, Ms. Normoyle, but it is quite amusing that you buried the lede. Not only did Alex Padilla support the bill – Alex Padilla was a cosponsor of the bill (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1462/cosponsors). It’d be a bad look (very common for Democrats) to vote against his own bill. And are you sure you want to hitch your wagon to Schiff’s horse? Schiff is under investigation for illegally leaking information. I’d say Schiff’s “no” vote encourages everyone else to vote “yes.” Except, perhaps, other Democrats under investigation for illegal deeds. Perhaps Schiff’s opposition will lead to Padilla’s opposition in the future of anything Schiff. That’d be a great development. I’m grateful Padilla had the courage to say yes. At least Padilla is not barging into news conferences and charging at Republican speakers and subsequently being taken down to the ground.
And we’ve gone through this before. The status quo regarding forest management that you’re in favor of didn’t work out too well for folks in Los Angeles County. Wouldn’t it be better if we can make use of trees instead of allowing wildfires to burn trees and houses and many other things standing in their way? You say you want to protect the climate and conserve biodiversity but wouldn’t we protect the climate from forest fires and conserve biodiversity if we prevent our forests from burning down in the first place? Wildfires will occur but we can limit the size and scope of these wildfires with proven fire and forest management techniques. We know the status quo doesn’t work. Will the “Fix Our Forests Act” work? Perhaps, but only if competent folks are in charge of it. Preferably a bipartisan bunch – like the legislation proposed.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.