The March 8 issue of the Daily Journal included an article about Burlingame encouraging biotech development, and some discussion about what possible community benefits the city might ask for in exchange for city approval. Unfortunately, the discussion left out the elephant in the room — where will the future employees live?
Both South San Francisco and San Carlos are adding biotech to their cities and both recognize the potential impact on housing supply, but neither has a truly viable plan for addressing the issue. Looks like Burlingame could fall into that same category.
Biotech is a valuable industry in the age of COVID-19 and all the other medical issues humanity will face in the foreseeable future and deserves a space in San Mateo County, but unlike the social network and tech world of Facebook, Apple, Google, etc. it cannot run its business remotely. R&D research needs workers that must be physically present every day, which means commuting.
When negotiating community benefits with developers, cities should insist on a plan for housing the expected increase in employees. This doesn’t mean that the biotech companies need to actually build the housing, but they should work with the cities and both private and nonprofit developers to create a viable plan for providing the housing needed in a location that is convenient for commuting.
It is my hope that the cities get this message and insist on community benefits that include both affordable and market-rate housing in their approval process.
David, why not force these corporations to build housing? Just a plan means nothing if there is no skin in the game. Even our lame school boards are considering building housing for the staff and faculty. Google has actually tried it in Mountain View but the city for a strange reason did not want to rezone adjacent commercial property.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
David, why not force these corporations to build housing? Just a plan means nothing if there is no skin in the game. Even our lame school boards are considering building housing for the staff and faculty. Google has actually tried it in Mountain View but the city for a strange reason did not want to rezone adjacent commercial property.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.