Regarding your story, “Filling classrooms” in the June 6 edition of the Daily Journal, according to ed-data.org, that school district enrollment has steadily declined from 8,707 students in the 2017-18 school year to 7,933 in 2021-22 (latest figures) for Census Day Enrollment.
Based on your numbers of teachers and students, it looks like the teacher/student ratio is about 18 students per teacher.
It’s my understanding that small class sizes are only advantageous in grades K-third. Increasing class sizes would go a long way to solve the teacher storage “problem.”
And with a decline of 961 students, the district should have closed two to three schools, freeing those funds for higher teacher salaries and benefits.
Recommended for you
We’re always hearing teachers are underpaid, so close a couple of schools and use those saved funds to pay teachers more!
What they should be focused on is test scores: English (49.08%) below-grade level and 60.93% below-grade level in math.
This is a school district that has failed their students!
Mark Hinkle
Morgan Hill
The letter writer is the president of the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association.
The author is correct that South San Francisco Unified is a "failing district", but draws the wrong conclusions.
1. Local school districts are super-rich. So much so that Education Augmentation Revenue Funding (ERAF) is send back to cities and counties.
2. SSFSD is a "Basic Aid" district - they don't care about enrollment numbers, fewer students means more money can be moved from "education" to "administration"
3. In fact once a district turns "Basic Aid" (most peninsula districts are now) cutting "customer service" and keeping families away often becomes top priority
4. When students leave you would think class room sizes would shrink - and yet they still grow.
5. Small class room sizes matter at all ages - even University and beyond. It's the difference between real Education and providing a slide-show or watching a youtube video.
6. "Teacher Shortage" is another trick of bad local school districts to excuse their poor education results, but it is a made-up crisis.
7. "Teacher Shortage" is also the perfect explanation why the ratio of administrators:teachers keeps growing in favor of district administrators.
8. SSFSD pays its teachers above average and 3-4 times more than an average private school teacher gets.
9. And still only 33% of it's budget goes to teachers (salaries and benefits)
10. because SSFSD also pays its administrator way, way above average
Summary: teachers, class room size, budgets, etc are NOT the problem. ALL local school districts have too much real estate in the form of magnet schools, middle schools, alternative schools, middle schools, etc. If you see public schools with names or themes like "Academy", "Alternative", "Parent Participation", "Language Immersion", "GATE", "enrichment", "Montessori", "K-5", "Middle", you also found the problem. The more schools like this a district has the worse their financials. Just look at San Mateo, Redwood City, and SFUSD - three of the worst districts and with the highest percentage of families attending private and charter schools.
And every time voters approve another real estate bond - they help to make this worse. The real solution would actually be "Defunding the School Districts".
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Mr. Hinkle - Yes, possibly close schools. But even more, do away with the excessive number of administrative positions.
According to article published in Imprimis, Hilldale College,...
Percentage Growth of Population in Public Schools, 2000-2019
Students = 7.6%
Teachers = 8.7%
District Administration = 87.6%
The author is correct that South San Francisco Unified is a "failing district", but draws the wrong conclusions.
1. Local school districts are super-rich. So much so that Education Augmentation Revenue Funding (ERAF) is send back to cities and counties.
2. SSFSD is a "Basic Aid" district - they don't care about enrollment numbers, fewer students means more money can be moved from "education" to "administration"
3. In fact once a district turns "Basic Aid" (most peninsula districts are now) cutting "customer service" and keeping families away often becomes top priority
4. When students leave you would think class room sizes would shrink - and yet they still grow.
5. Small class room sizes matter at all ages - even University and beyond. It's the difference between real Education and providing a slide-show or watching a youtube video.
6. "Teacher Shortage" is another trick of bad local school districts to excuse their poor education results, but it is a made-up crisis.
7. "Teacher Shortage" is also the perfect explanation why the ratio of administrators:teachers keeps growing in favor of district administrators.
8. SSFSD pays its teachers above average and 3-4 times more than an average private school teacher gets.
9. And still only 33% of it's budget goes to teachers (salaries and benefits)
10. because SSFSD also pays its administrator way, way above average
Summary: teachers, class room size, budgets, etc are NOT the problem. ALL local school districts have too much real estate in the form of magnet schools, middle schools, alternative schools, middle schools, etc. If you see public schools with names or themes like "Academy", "Alternative", "Parent Participation", "Language Immersion", "GATE", "enrichment", "Montessori", "K-5", "Middle", you also found the problem. The more schools like this a district has the worse their financials. Just look at San Mateo, Redwood City, and SFUSD - three of the worst districts and with the highest percentage of families attending private and charter schools.
And every time voters approve another real estate bond - they help to make this worse. The real solution would actually be "Defunding the School Districts".
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.