Editor,
The San Mateo City Council opposes Measure Y and prefers to use the general plan process. I’ve attended some of these types of sessions and I have not been pleased.
Editor,
The San Mateo City Council opposes Measure Y and prefers to use the general plan process. I’ve attended some of these types of sessions and I have not been pleased.
One workshop started with a consultant proclaiming the market demands higher density. No justification, no explanation, no persuasion. The attendees were told we would work in groups at tables that had a map of the city and a pile of Legos. We would put rows of Legos in areas where taller buildings might be appropriate, perhaps, say, around Central Park or the train station, hint-hint.
Someone stood up to speak in favor of shorter buildings. Sorry, not allowed. No public comments. End of discussion. So we sat at our tables and played with our Legos. You didn’t get any atta-boys if you didn’t put some Legos on the map.
Councilman Rick Bonilla and Ron Munekawa from the planning department were there. I suggested they talk privately with the folks who wanted to speak. They declined. Those folks could speak at a subsequent meeting, they were trying to hijack this meeting.
City officials use these “visioning” or “consensus building” sessions to influence public opinion, to cajole a relatively small group of people to concur with decisions that officials have already made. Search for these terms on web for details. I prefer straight talk, plain dealing, citizen to citizen conversation.
As for this election, if you prefer shorter buildings, vote no on Measure R and yes on Measure Y.
Jack Daane
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Great letter Jack, thank you for illustrating how silly the pro density and congestion attitudes emanating out of city hall. Our council members are mad at the people they govern over in San Mateo and they initiated Measure R to confuse us in attempt to shoot down a San Mateo voter Measure Y. People of San Mateo need to realize the current occupants of city hall do not like us and want to force high density housing down our throats whether we like it or not. We are much easier to control when we are packed together in population zones of their choosing.
Mr. Daane,
Since my name was mentioned I feel compelled to respond. I have been present at several of these exercises where the public was invited to participate in the planning process. Yes I do recall that in this case there were Legos but nobody was required to place any Legos anywhere on the map. At the end of the exercise each table reported out on the different positions that were taken in arriving at the map that was developed on the table. I believe that anybody who wished to make a comment was allowed a moment to do so during that process. I don’t specifically recall Mr. Daane speaking to me but what I do know is that council members were told that we would be observing only. This was an opportunity for us to see and hear the thoughts and feelings of the public who attended. Quite often when council members speak before or during this kind of session with members of the public it may have influence on the outcome of the process. We were working to avoid any undue influence on the public process.
I am prepared to hear criticism of my statements, based on my best recollection of these events. I only asked that we keep it civil and respectful.
Rick Bonilla
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.