Editor,
On her campaign disclosure filing (Form 497) dated Oct. 9, Candidate Amourence Lee reported receiving a campaign donation for $4,922.76 from a Political Action Committee (PAC).
Sun and clouds mixed. High 66F. Winds SSW at 10 to 15 mph..
Becoming windy and cloudy with periods of rain developing overnight. Low 57F. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. Chance of rain 100%. Rainfall near a quarter of an inch. Winds could occasionally gust over 40 mph.
Updated: November 4, 2025 @ 11:52 am
Editor,
On her campaign disclosure filing (Form 497) dated Oct. 9, Candidate Amourence Lee reported receiving a campaign donation for $4,922.76 from a Political Action Committee (PAC).
PACs may spend as much as they want for or against any candidate. By law, these expenditures must be uncoordinated and independent. For direct contributions, however, San Mateo has a strict contribution limit of $1,000 from organizations.
Filing Form 497 implies that candidate Lee coordinated with the PAC to send out a mailer. She also has stated publicly that, because she designated the contribution as “in kind,” it was not subject to the limits.
The decision to accept this contribution should raise red flags because one of the following must be true:
1). Candidates can willfully misclassify a large donation as “in kind” to skirt our city’s contribution limits and ensure they could coordinate with a PAC — leaving the door open for blatant, serious campaign violations; or
2). Candidates can exploit this huge loophole in our contribution laws, meaning that any candidate can accept unlimited contributions from any PAC (as long as the contribution was designated “in kind”).
This has never been done in the history of San Mateo.
Our city attorney has determined that this matter is serious enough to refer it to the District Attorney’s Office for investigation. In the interest of transparency and fairness to the other candidates, I sincerely hope that District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe’s team expedites this investigation and findings.
Thomas Morgan
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(8) comments
I'd suggest getting your grapes from a different market, Thomas. These seem pretty sour.
What Thomas Morgan's letter fails to note is that Amo Lee checked with the City Attorney prior to accepting this contribution, and was informed that it was not subject to the cash donation limits. If that was an error, it seems like an honest mistake, and she's been nothing but transparent and above board about this all along.
Meanwhile, another candidate, Lisa Diaz Nash, has accepted over $100K in support from the California Apartment Association, a conservative, Sacramento-based PAC that fights rent control and opposes eviction protections.
I know who I'd rather have on City Council, and it's not someone who takes a ton of money from people who don't even live here.
BTW, all this information is easily accessible here: https://www.southtechhosting.com/SanMateoCity/CampaignDocsWebRetrieval/
If what you say is true it is proof of coordination with the PAC( I need to check with the City Attorney before I can accept your contribution, is a smoking gun), which is a problem.
Thomas, I don't have any proof of anything. I'm merely reminding you of what Amourence Lee told you when you first raised this issue on her Facebook page.
The key for San Mateans is just don't vote for Amourence Lee. Nobody even knows this woman unless you are part of the Democratic Progressive Cabal that is infecting city councils or you live in North Central and are part of the us vs. them club of malcontents. There would be nothing better to wake up after this election and have Amourence Lee out of my city hall. She is part of a group of left wing parasites infecting healthy cities with racial rhetoric, BLM and a special interest catering to only one group of people in San Mateo. Let's get rid of her once and for all and then start focusing our attention on the rest of city council in San Mateo. There rejection of the people's Measure Y is all you need to know about this current board. Save San Mateo and let's rid ourselves of Amourence Lee and all her supporters who do not even live in San Mateo or care about you or I.
I would encourage people to get to know Councilwoman Amourence Lee, check out her web site (amourencelee.com), look at her platform, and the people who support her. Her list of endorsements is huge and incredibly diverse and I've worked with and know many of the people on that list and they are completely the opposite of what you (Christopher) describe in your comments. Amo stood with me to raise the rainbow flag over City Hall and I'll stand by her against mean-spirited attacks like this. Whether you realize it or not, the language you used in your comments is racist. My people (Jews and LGBTQIA+) have been called "infections" and "parasites" before as have Asians and too many other people, with dire results. Words matter Christopher.
I don't give a red cent what you or your people find offensive. I am trying to save the city that I love from this new breed of Democrat that has I completely despise. My right, I am an American, if you do not like it, you can go pound sand for all I care Craig. I hope I am making myself crystal clear. Your attempt to silence me using your usual tactics will be ineffective, its too important to let that stop me in the slightest this election.
And therein lies the problem. When we stop caring about others because we believe our cause is greater than the lives of those with whom we may disagree, when we use language that can and does incite violence, including a rock thrown through a San Mateo family's window while the children were playing inside, we're veering away from Democracy and that makes me sad and somewhat afraid. Of course you are free to use whatever language you like, but why can't you make your case without language that casts others as less than human? You say you love your city and I believe you. That city is made up of thousands of wildly diverse people of all political, religious, racial, socioeconomic, stripes. Can you love them as much as you love your city? They ARE the city. We ARE the city. When the election is over we are blessed to get to live with each other, help each other, cheer each other on.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.