At rush hour — and increasingly the rest of the time — traffic chokes San Mateo County, clogging Highway 101, El Camino Real, Interstate 280, even some side streets.
Jeremy Levine
On July 1, a new state law went into effect offering a solution.
The law in question, Senate Bill 79, authored by state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), allows five- to seven-story apartments within a half mile of most Caltrain stations in San Mateo County (within a quarter mile for smaller cities).
SB 79 reflects the state’s response to auto gridlock and the ongoing housing shortage: Homes near transit will help every city foster vibrant transportation, promote housing affordability, and ultimately save money.
Most urgently, the law will reduce traffic by supporting local transit ridership.
Local transit needs riders to succeed, and the most likely transit riders are nearby residents. Research in Transportation, the leading journal about multi-model transportation topics, found that more than 50% of residents living within a half mile of a transit stop will walk to commuter rail; almost 90% walk within a quarter mile.
Caltrain has already seen big gains after electrifying its trains — annual ridership surged from 6.2 million in 2024 to 9.1 million in 2025 — but the agency continues to face long-term funding shortfalls, even if Bay Area voters pass the regional transit measure this November. By promoting more housing near transit, SB 79 sows the seeds for continuing to improve our transit system and reduce auto-dependence.
Beyond reducing traffic and promoting sustainability, SB 79 will reduce costs for cities to comply with state and regional housing laws, unlocking new funding opportunities.
Recommended for you
For example, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Transit-Oriented Communities Policy, adopted earlier this year, requires cities to meet minimum residential density thresholds within a half mile of transit stations as a condition of eligibility for regional infrastructure funding. MTC has set aside $45 million in a dedicated TOC Incentive Program, part of an overall $820 million federal funding package running through 2030, that cities can compete for by demonstrating compliance across those four categories on a 100-point scoring system.
SB 79 eases compliance substantially: All areas subject to SB 79 will automatically receive full credit for the residential density standard — the most demanding component of the program. Peninsula cities served by Caltrain and BART can stop spending staff time and legal resources proving density compliance, and instead direct those resources toward the other criteria to qualify for infrastructure funding.
Longer term, SB 79 will speed up compliance with the state’s housing goals. San Mateo County jurisdictions collectively spent millions of dollars and years of staff time updating their housing elements to demonstrate local capacity for new homes. SB 79 provides a straightforward process to plan for housing that will make future compliance much easier.
Furthermore, SB 79 provides flexibility for local planning efforts. The law gives cities broad local control to exempt historic sites and shift density around within the half-mile transit radius. Otherwise, it aligns with widely used laws like State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Accountability Act, SB 423, AB 130, the Permit Streamlining Act, and others universally used by new homes in San Mateo County.
By combining SB 79 with these other laws, projects will be able to move faster through the local process. City planning staff long burdened by extensive public hearings and reviews will be able to ministerially approve projects that already comply with local law.
Housing from SB 79 will support broader equity goals: Lower-income residents and much of our local workforce have been forced into insecure housing, resigned to long commutes from far-away cities, or pushed out of the region entirely. SB 79 will help cities promote housing options reflecting a more equitable future in San Mateo County.
Across the Peninsula, cities are demonstrating strong leadership on SB 79. Menlo Park, Redwood City, Belmont, San Mateo, South San Francisco, Daly City and others are embracing the law. Unlike San Francisco, which temporarily exempted large swaths of the city from SB 79, most Peninsula cities are letting the law go into effect with only minor modifications, such as exemptions for historic properties. Some may use the local control provisions increase densities on some sites and decrease them on others — but the vast majority are forgoing loopholes to seize the opportunities the law provides.
The benefits of additional housing near transit will demonstrate San Mateo County’s regional leadership, showcasing more financially sound, sustainable, affordable communities — and ending the scourge of gridlock.
Jeremy Levine is the policy manager for the Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County.
The premise that adding more housing and more people will reduce traffic is false.
While locating housing near transit may increase transit use for some residents, it does not follow that adding thousands of new residents will reduce overall congestion.
In many Peninsula communities, roads, intersections, schools, utilities, and public services are already operating at near full capacity and with more dense housing being built, we will be breaking our ability to transport people, goods, and services.
The HLC is continuing to promote false narratives to benefit developers - not people.
Transportation planning should be grounded in real-world data, not assumptions.
Growth without matching transportation infrastructure is far more likely to increase congestion than eliminate it.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
The premise that adding more housing and more people will reduce traffic is false.
While locating housing near transit may increase transit use for some residents, it does not follow that adding thousands of new residents will reduce overall congestion.
In many Peninsula communities, roads, intersections, schools, utilities, and public services are already operating at near full capacity and with more dense housing being built, we will be breaking our ability to transport people, goods, and services.
The HLC is continuing to promote false narratives to benefit developers - not people.
Transportation planning should be grounded in real-world data, not assumptions.
Growth without matching transportation infrastructure is far more likely to increase congestion than eliminate it.
ProPublica reports that HLC's total revenue last year was $1,791,606. It doesn't say where it came from. Does anyone care to guess?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.