San Mateo County will protect reproductive rights for women and is taking steps to ensure that our local clinics receive the critical support and protections necessary to expand access.
And time is of the essence.
The recently leaked draft U.S. Supreme Court opinion indicates that the court will revoke the reproductive and privacy rights given to women for nearly 50 years under Roe v. Wade. If accurate, half of the states will turn back the clock on protections for women by banning abortion thereby forcing untold numbers to seek care in states like California and counties like San Mateo County.
The flight to states like California and counties such as ours of women seeking quality reproductive care continues to grow as ever more restrictive and punitive laws have been adopted by state legislatures all over the nation. According to representatives of Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, the affiliate serving Northern California communities, the number of women from outside of California seeking reproductive care at area clinics has increased recently. In fact, as many as 33 women seeking care through Planned Parenthood Mar Monte facilities did so since Senate Bill 8 — state legislation that severely restricted abortions — went into effect in Texas on Sept. 1, 2021.
More significantly, from July 2021 and May 15, 2022, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte provided abortion care to 87 patients from out of state.
Recommended for you
For all these reasons and more, we proposed, and the Board of Supervisors adopted, a resolution affirming San Mateo County’s unwavering support for women’s reproductive freedom and health care policy. The unanimously supported resolution represents the initial step in a package of efforts to support unfettered access to reproductive care in our communities.
First, we propose direct financial support to Planned Parenthood Clinics within San Mateo County to support the purchase of critical infrastructure such as ultrasound machines, exam tables and an upgrade of the agency’s electronic data system. These investments will enable our local facilities to increase patient capacity and prepare for the influx of women seeking care.
Second, staff is assessing the feasibility of a protective buffer zone for patients seeking care at the Planned Parenthood facility located in the unincorporated North Fair Oaks community. The city of San Mateo recently adopted an ordinance to establish a buffer zone around the clinic in that city, after multiple reported incidents of harassment and bullying of patients.
Finally, the county is poised to support state efforts to expand access to reproductive care for women and gender nonconforming individuals.
San Mateo County has always supported a robust health care system ensuring access to all those who need it. Through its county-operated health care delivery system and the public health programs it administers, the county strives to improve the lives of everyone in San Mateo County and to provide services and outreach to build trust with women, particularly women of color, low-income women and gender nonconforming individuals. Although San Mateo County provides robust services, community partners such as Planned Parenthood represent a crucial and increasingly important element of access to health care, particularly reproductive care.
These actions represent the first response to what will be a long-term effort to protect women’s reproductive and privacy rights. As these rights remain under assault at all levels, San Mateo County will continue to support women and access to health care and our board will proudly lead this charge.
Dave Pine and Warren Slocum are members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors.
Is there a problem? I see few, and sometime no, protesters at the clinic on ECR. The DJ should check this out. A lot of political pandering is going on. How about a buffer zone for all places open to the public?
Hi Will - There actually is a problem looming. States like Texas are working on legislation that would prosecute women for going to other states for reproductive care, AND, prosecute or allow civil suits against anyone who provides support to women seeking care in other states. And, anti-choice organizations are planning to send activists/protesters to states like California to block clinics. Our legislators do need to take proactive action to protect visitors and our state's citizens from lawsuits, prosecution, harassment and violence for accessing care that is legal in our state.
"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is." -Sister Joan Chittister
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
Shouldn't this be called non-productive rights? Aren't we getting tired of these woke statements?
Is there a problem? I see few, and sometime no, protesters at the clinic on ECR. The DJ should check this out. A lot of political pandering is going on. How about a buffer zone for all places open to the public?
Hi Will - There actually is a problem looming. States like Texas are working on legislation that would prosecute women for going to other states for reproductive care, AND, prosecute or allow civil suits against anyone who provides support to women seeking care in other states. And, anti-choice organizations are planning to send activists/protesters to states like California to block clinics. Our legislators do need to take proactive action to protect visitors and our state's citizens from lawsuits, prosecution, harassment and violence for accessing care that is legal in our state.
Sorry Craig - they are called pro-life. Pregnant women have choices.
Demonstrably not pro-life. Both anti-choice and forced-birth are more accurate terms.
"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is." -Sister Joan Chittister
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.