Jon Mays

In the discussions around next steps to ensure safe living and working environments for this county’s farmworkers, some have referred to that type of employment as “unskilled labor.” There has also been the sentiment that “we” need to do something for the workers because “they” provide us with this work.

I have long been irritated by the connotation of “we need these people” to do this type of work because somehow it is beneath “us.” This sentiment is often expressed when talking about how “we” should do something to help “them.” While this type of statement is often made in a way that seeks to assist workers, and often with good intentions, it is an instance in which someone is treating another group as “other.” This is wrong. In no way should there be a second class of workers, workers who “we” need to do lower or “unskilled” work.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Terence Y

Interesting thoughts from Julie Lind, but really? Another government task force? Another government labor office? More core service or employment agencies? Sounds like a continuing expansion of government services, which I would say, likely duplicate services that are already available (and which likely duplicate services of other groups). Employer-provided housing? For a seasonal workforce? If anything, I see unanticipated consequences, and mostly for workers… I’m sure farmers will pencil out the cost/benefit ratio and if there are more costs than benefits, they’ll explore the mechanization route, or replanting their fields with products that can be reaped mechanically, lowering their costs. Either way, workers lose…

smdj2019

Thank you John! All work has great value. Read the book, "Being Nickeled and Dimed in America" by Barbara Ehrenreich. She stated in the book that she could not have done the work of theses so called "unskilled jobs" without help and training from her coworkers.

Rich Hedges

aball52

reminds me of the baywood parents referring to those kids bussed to their campus they wzant the new fc school to absorb thise kids so their scores will improve send those kids to fc. the teachers told me about these comments those kids re nort central kids never having a campus of their own baywood test scoreswill improve if fc has these kids...

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here