San Bruno passes measure to raise heights: Measure N modifies a 1977 ordinance and focuses on downtown revitalization

“It’s a good thing for San Bruno,” said Mayor Jim Ruane, who was a proponent of the measure. “I’ve been pushing this for a while. We’ll have some decent measured growth. Hopefully this is large step forward to get shovels in the ground.”

The ordinance was the result of a voter initiative, which was intended to preserve the existing character of San Bruno by requiring voter approval for high-rise developments, increased density in existing neighborhoods and projects encroaching upon scenic corridors and open spaces. The increased height limits would allow for more creative development, said proponents like City Manager Connie Jackson, while others argued it will gentrify a working class area, increase congestion and cause water shortages.

The 1977 ordinance prohibited buildings or other structures to exceed 50 feet or three stories in the Transit Corridors Area unless approved by the majority of voters of San Bruno. If voters approve Measure N, heights could reach 70 feet along El Camino Real within the Transit Corridors Area or two stories higher than what is now allowed. Along San Bruno Avenue, buildings could rise up to 65 feet or two stories higher than what is now allowed, while the central business district along San Mateo Avenue could go up to 55 feet or one story higher than what is now allowed. The Caltrain station area could rise the most to 90 feet or four stories more than what is now allowed.

On the other side, Millbrae’s Doug Radtke, the campaign chair against Measure N, said the cost of gentrification, which would result from adding newer housing, is less affordable housing and more San Franciscans being transported to San Bruno. Radtke lived half of his childhood in San Bruno. Downtown San Bruno’s narrow streets and infrastructure aren’t set up to handle 1,000 additional rentals.

“I was kind of surprised (by the vote); I thought the turnout was a bit low,” he said. “Obviously, the no side had no funding or a great deal of developed literature available. I don’t think a yes vote is a game killer for San Bruno.”

Radtke noted the no side was an opportunity to educate and give people a different perspective. Ultimately, 1,818 people, or 32.69 percent of voters, voted against the measure.

“We’re just going to have to see what happens,” he said.

Jackson said the biggest concern right now is being able to fill vacant spaces, not only for property owners but also for adjacent businesses not getting foot traffic. She imagines a thoughtful integration of new businesses with those that have been around and are successful, she said.

angela@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105