Cloudy skies with a few showers this afternoon. High 59F. Winds SSE at 10 to 15 mph. Chance of rain 30%..
Tonight
Showers early, becoming a steady rain overnight. Windy. Potential for heavy rainfall. Low near 55F. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. Chance of rain 100%. Rainfall near a half an inch.
To avoid extra smoke from wet brush and grass, Cal Fire and SFPUC officials opted to limit a planned prescribed fire to remove mature coyote brush at 6 acres rather than 52 on Tuesday.
The burn was between Interstate 280 and St. James Road in Belmont to target dense coyote brush and poison oak and was intended to be one day. However, while the grass caught fire, the brush didn’t likely because of recent rain. The burn will take place later, officials said.
The photo above is NOT the burn site; the burn site is comprised of 80% native chaparral which is naturally lower fire risk than the invasive grasses that return after a burn. In June 2025 California 4th Appellate Court ruled that CalFire's statewide Vegetation Program (VTP) lacked adequate environmental analysis, particularly around habitat conversion (shrub to non-native grass weeds) and inherently increased flammability. In other words, burning shrub habitat increases flammability instead of reducing in. CalFire acknowledged they could not get this shrub to ignite.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
The photo above is NOT the burn site; the burn site is comprised of 80% native chaparral which is naturally lower fire risk than the invasive grasses that return after a burn. In June 2025 California 4th Appellate Court ruled that CalFire's statewide Vegetation Program (VTP) lacked adequate environmental analysis, particularly around habitat conversion (shrub to non-native grass weeds) and inherently increased flammability. In other words, burning shrub habitat increases flammability instead of reducing in. CalFire acknowledged they could not get this shrub to ignite.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.