Half Moon Bay’s district election map 504c was approved by a council majority at its Jan. 19 council meeting.
Half Moon Bay’s City Council is moving away from its four-district, elected mayor system to a five-district model with an annual rotating mayor just a few years after choosing its current design — and before actually implementing it.
The decision was made as the council was looking for public input on retaining the current model or using another system. Options included four districts with either a mayor elected by all voters in the city for two or four years or five districts with an annual rotating mayor. City Manager Bob Nisbet said the council in 2018 agreed to transition to four districts with an at-large mayor. However, the switch hadn’t happened yet because the council agreed to a transition over several years. The city is still operating with five districts and a rotating mayor.
“You could argue we are moving back, but we never actually made the switch, so we have never had an at-large mayor,” Nisbet said.
A slim council majority selected a five-district map for upcoming council elections recommended by its Redistricting Advisory Committee that prioritized keeping similar communities together, despite some councilmembers’ pushback.
“I support the committee and its recommendation, and I want to continue to keep my fingerprints off what they feel is the best map and go with that and preserve the integrity of that,” Councilmember Robert Brownstone said.
A council majority voted for a five-district map dividing Half Moon Bay called 504c over a map with four districts based on the preference of the Redistricting Advisory Committee. The seven-person citizen committee was responsible for studying and coming up with several map options over the past six months for new council election boundaries. The committee recommended the five-district option over four districts because it better represents communities of interest. The current model includes four districts and an elective mayor with a four-year term voted on in 2018. The committee was responsible for presenting map options to the council.
Redistricting is done every 10 years with new census data. Nisbet said Half Moon Bay redistricted in 2018, but the new 2020 census data meant it had to redistrict again just a few years later. He noted changes in state law criteria factored into the council reconsidering a change. All five current councilmembers live in separate districts, meaning none will have to run against each other under the new map.
The city will hold a Feb. 15 public hearing for map selection and election sequencing, followed by ordinance adoption March 15 to ensure it is in place for November elections.
Survey results
Mayor Debbie Ruddock and Vice Mayor Deborah Penrose supported a map with four districts and an at-large mayor for future council elections. Ruddock cited a community outreach survey that garnered 350 responses found 51% favored four districts with a two-year mayor and 18% favored four districts with a four-year mayor. Around 31% favored five districts. The city sent a survey to each household in Half Moon Bay.
“Sixty-nine percent of those participating in the survey wanted four districts. They wanted fewer districts, and 69% wanted to elect Half Moon Bay’s mayor. That’s pretty overwhelming,” Ruddock said.
She said the best way to avoid political fragmentation was a directly elected mayor who could balance the potential increase in power of long-tenured city staff. She worried about more volatile city elections and cited her experience with politics and power relationships.
“I think it creates more stability and gives the mayor a chance to further advance the whole council’s missions and keep everybody on track to representing the community,” Ruddock said.
Recommended for you
Penrose agreed with Ruddock and favored four districts and a mayor elected for two years to be the unifying voice. She was against redistricting and was interested in fighting the issue in court.
“I think 69% of 350 people is a statement. I don’t think you can ignore it. “If it was 52%, I might have some problems with it, but it wasn’t. It was 69%,” Penrose said.
Committee recommendation
Councilmembers Joaquin Jimenez, Robert Brownstone and Harvey Rarback thought differently and followed the Redistricting Committee suggestion. Rarback favored keeping the Canada Cove area together with the South Main Street senior area to give the senior community a unified voice.
“I am all in favor of [map] 504c. I’m really thankful to the committee for producing that map,” Rarback said.
Ruddock asked the council for its reasoning in not giving further weight to the community survey. Jimenez noted it was not a direct representation of the community, while Brownstone called it too small to make particular conclusions. Rarback said the Redistricting Advisory Committee unanimously endorsed the five district model, and he valued its judgment.
“I have more respect for them, in this particular case, than the 350 responses we got,” Rarback said.
Transition
Half Moon Bay voted in 2018 to transition to district elections after threats of litigation under the California Voting Rights Act from Southern California attorney Kevin Shenkman. Shenkman claimed the city has violated the California Voting Rights Act because “voting in Half Moon Bay is racially polarized, resulting in minority vote dilution.” A district-based election will divide the city into a set number of districts, with one councilmember living in the district chosen by voters residing in that area. Voters would only be able to vote within their area. Districts must be contiguous, not be drawn with race as the predominant factor, have a nearly equal population and keep communities of interest together.
Each district has around 2,300 to 2,400 people and has a white plurality. Districts 2 and 3 have 41% and 39% Hispanic populations, respectively, the largest of the five districts. District 1 has a Hispanic population of 28%, District 5, 24% and District 4, 17%. The Asian population ranges from 6% to 10%, and the Black population is 1%.
The council voted 3-2 to bring the 504c map back for final council adoption, with Penrose and Ruddock voting against it. The city must adopt the final map no later than April 17.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.