Imagery from a staff presentation seeks to show highlights of potential changes to the Broadway area of Burlingame, but much of it is linked to a working train station nearby.
Constructing a parking structure or creating one-way streets or a permit parking program were discussed by the Burlingame Planning Commission as potential solutions to alleviate increased congestion from ambitious downtown Broadway redesign plans.
The redesign of the downtown district — in close proximity to the Broadway train station — has been created with transit-oriented housing development in mind, due in part to the fact that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission is tying distribution of federal grant funding to certain density and development standards.
“You could look at it as the carrot, or you could look at it as the stick, that MTC is tying its [One Bay Area Grant] funding to these policies,” Community Development Director Neda Zayer said.
Burlingame’s current zoning standards for the area allows for development of 101 new residential units — at 50-unit density per acre — and 127 new parking spaces.
MTC’s policy, however, would allow for 173 new residential units and no minimum parking spots to push for a transit-focused area, consultant Dan Amsden said. Amsden’s development firm is proposing Burlingame build that new housing on city-owned parking lots.
But because the future of the Broadway train station itself is uncertain, the Broadway redesign has been thrown into doubt — a consideration about which Burlingame councilmembers previously voiced serious concerns. Ongoing negotiations about a stalled grade separation project could mean the train station will stop operating entirely.
Project designers are operating as if a new train station will be constructed and the area will remain a transit hub, Amsden said, though changes could be made if necessary.
“There’s some question of whether the station will be a part of [the grade separation] or not a part of [the grade separation]. We’re trying to be flexible,” Amsden said. “This project is hoping grade separation and the station remain and become an active piece of the rest of this process. We are assuming it is going to happen.”
Should the project move forward as planned, commissioners warned that increasing housing density and limiting parking spaces — potentially creating parallel parking on Broadway — could become an issue and create greater congestion. It would likely be necessary to build a parking garage, multiple commissioners said.
Recommended for you
“I remain very concerned about impacts on people. Parking is going to become worse, I think,” Commissioner Jennifer Pfaff said. “I’m having a really difficult time finding how the two can meet with what is allowable now as far as density.”
Former Traffic, Safety and Parking Commissioner Howard Wetten also advocated for a parking garage during the meeting and said his 11-year-old daughter had been hit by a car whose driver was looking for parking in the area.
“I think parking is so constrained at Broadway you really shouldn’t do anything there unless you’re willing to put a structure in,” he said. “I think that balance is essential. If you’re not willing to do a parking structure, you have to step back from any of these plans.”
Commissioners also suggested the possibility of creating one-way roads on nearby side streets to help alleviate congestion and the institution of a permit parking program, where only residents were allowed to park on those streets.
The area around the 1300 block is already filled with cars from visitors to the Broadway district, which could pose a safety issue for ambulances and makes it extremely difficult for residents to find parking, Commissioner Sandy Comaroto said. She suggested creating a permit program only for residents in those areas if development moves forward.
“This is not going to go over well,” she said. “People should not park on the street … unless you have a permit.”
Zayer emphasized the point of the Feb. 10 study session was to hear commissioner’s opinions on how additional parking lots — whether for the public or incorporated into the residential design — should be implemented.
“You have flexibility to design them the way you want to,” she said.
It's a well known golden law of agriculture: If Thou Seed Congestion, Thou Shalt Harvest Congestion!
Translated to modern times, if you want more people, but less traffic you need to invest into congestion-reducing modes of transportation. Supporting only huge, heavy trucks, vans, and EVs isn't cutting it.
If you want more business in your business areas without creating more congestion and losing more money on parking lots, you need to invest in Safe-Routes-To-Downtown (either bus lanes or bike lanes) and Safe-Routes-To-Transit (SR2T)
And if you invest into Transit Oriented Development without improving Public Transit you end up with congestion and people just parking everywhere.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
It's a well known golden law of agriculture: If Thou Seed Congestion, Thou Shalt Harvest Congestion!
Translated to modern times, if you want more people, but less traffic you need to invest into congestion-reducing modes of transportation. Supporting only huge, heavy trucks, vans, and EVs isn't cutting it.
If you want more business in your business areas without creating more congestion and losing more money on parking lots, you need to invest in Safe-Routes-To-Downtown (either bus lanes or bike lanes) and Safe-Routes-To-Transit (SR2T)
And if you invest into Transit Oriented Development without improving Public Transit you end up with congestion and people just parking everywhere.
High-density, affordable housing requires high-density, affordable transportation first.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.