Editor,
Let’s single out Supervisor Jackie Speier for her skepticism of the proposed, regressive half-cent sales tax hike for transit.
Editor,
Let’s single out Supervisor Jackie Speier for her skepticism of the proposed, regressive half-cent sales tax hike for transit.
Supervisor Canepa claims voters support the tax based on a “survey.” But that survey was a classic push-poll — respondents were spoon-fed pro-tax talking points (“fiscal cliff,” anyone?). Here’s what voters weren’t told:
1). This tax would push the sales tax rate above 10% for the first time — 10.38% in Redwood City.
2). It’s being sponsored by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the same outfit that understated the cost of the so-called “Affordable” Housing Bond by hundreds of millions of dollars per year. MTC has the credibility of a used car salesman.
3). A special-purpose tax like this is supposed to require a two-thirds public vote. But local officials are pretending it’s a “citizens’ initiative” to lower the threshold to 50%. This proposal didn’t come from the public. Why is this even legal?
4). Caltrain hasn’t even figured out how to collect fares from its riders. Supervisor Mueller rode regularly and was never asked for a ticket. There’s no enforcement strategy.
5). As for BART — where to begin? BART Chair Debora Allen said it best: The agency’s dysfunction is the result of “many years of financial mismanagement” by its own board.
One could go on.
It’s unfortunate that Supervisor Speier is the only elected official with the wisdom to see through all of this. This regressive tax has all the look and feel of a con being perpetrated on a gullible public.
C.J. Keane
Chris Robell
Redwood City
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
Thanks for your letter, C.J. and Chris, highlighting the issues with any sales tax to support transit. It is likely that most, if not all, tax proceeds will continue paying for ever increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Transit companies are doing nothing to practice fiscal management and until they do, vote NO on any tax measures supporting transit (or anything else). As for Speier being the only one to see through “all of this” one has to wonder how much transit companies contributed to everyone’s campaign. Is there a correlation?
Great letter. Is anyone else tired of what seems like an endless stream of nickel and dime local tax increases? Maybe new taxes should be put on an April 16 ballot.
"But local officials are pretending it’s a “citizens’ initiative” to lower the threshold to 50%. This proposal didn’t come from the public. Why is this even legal?"
This is where ASTROTURFING comes into play. You have local nonprofits that pretend to be "bicycle coalitions", YIMBY-housing advocates, even PTAs/PTOs supporting "education". A lot of them are actually legit advocacy groups run by volunteers sacrificing time and effort to make the world a better place.
But there are quite a few bad apples. Whenever the leadership gets salaried, the prospects become very, very dicey. Because whoever gets paid can also be bought.
Example 1:
The salaried leadership of the Silicon Valley bicycle coalition for example is constantly helping with "surveys" and "outreach" and planning of "funding campaigns". But when it comes to local bicycle campaigns - like the Humboldt Bike lanes in San Mateo - you won't see any salaried leaders speaking out.
Example 2:
In Redwood City the leadership of the Redwood City Education Foundation is paid for by Stanford and Jay Paul - and parents that have no problem with School Segregation. The salaried leadership is basically put in place to make sure that politicians like Jeff Gee and Mike Wells look "clean" while really promoting School Segregation and Antisemitism ... and rerouting the money into real estate projects.
Example 3:
The leader Samaritan House celebrated the highway widening of 101 which brings more air pollution into low income neighborhoods along that freeway - and she was sitting on the CA clean air board at the time.
These are no accidents. This is just another form of corruption.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.