Editor,
I believe the race for San Mateo County Board of Supervisors District 2 is the most critical on November’s ballot. A recent example of leadership shows a stark contrast in styles and practices.
Editor,
I believe the race for San Mateo County Board of Supervisors District 2 is the most critical on November’s ballot. A recent example of leadership shows a stark contrast in styles and practices.
Noelia Corzo courageously advocated for citizen oversight of the Sheriff’s Office long before it was popular: calling for it and doing her own homework on its efficacy and giving her endorsement.
In contrast, back in February of 2021, her opponent, then Belmont Mayor Charles Stone, met with the Belmont Neighbors Against Racism and was encouraged to endorse civilian oversight of the sheriff’s department and to speak against the sheriff turning people over to ICE. Stone doubled-down on his personal relationship with Sheriff Bolanos and “s’plained” to the group that there was nothing really to be concerned about. As reported in this newspaper last week (Mark Simon’s article on Sept. 22) Stone finally conceded an endorsement for civilian oversight.
San Mateo County deserves a leader who, like Noelia Corzo, bases their decisions on community input, available data and an internal moral compass rather than one who makes decisions on external polls and personal political expediency — when the winds of change have already safely shifted.
The Rev. Ben Meyers
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(4) comments
I take issue with the writer's assertion that Noelia Corzo values community input. If she truly valued hearing the thoughts of her community, why would she block me, an ordinary San Matean, on her campaign Facebook page?
Good morning, Reverend
I don't know Noelia or Charles, but I'm guessing they're good people. I am curious, however, why you have suggested that Noelia has a stronger moral compass or possibly that Charles lacks such a moral compass based on one issue? Are there other related examples that tend to support your advocacy for Noelia?
I was glad Sup. Carol Groome finally changed her mind this month and also came around to voting in favor of the ad hoc committee to study independent civilian oversight. We're still a long way from making it happen and it will take Supervisors who is committed to it. I really want to see this in our community, so I'm voting for the candidate who has been an integral part of making it happen from the beginning. That's Noelia Corzo. She has been championing civilian oversight of the Sheriff's office for years, long before she was asking for votes.
Rev Ben, thank you for sharing your insights on this. I think it's important that we analyze not only the "what" people want to accomplish, but also the "how" - both are equally important.
Another point is whether a candidate acts based on political expediency vs having the best interest of the people in mind. For this particular issue, how is asking for transparency and accountability from any government agency not having the best interest in mind? Noelia has shown us she puts people before politics first.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.