Editor,
Julia Lutch wanted to remind Libby Traubman that Albert Einstein believed the United States should be allowed to possess nuclear weapons while others should not.
Editor,
Julia Lutch wanted to remind Libby Traubman that Albert Einstein believed the United States should be allowed to possess nuclear weapons while others should not.
In fact, by 1954 — just a year before his death — Einstein had come to deeply regret his role in urging the U.S. to pursue nuclear weapons. In a letter to his friend, chemist Linus Pauling, Einstein acknowledged that his famous 1939 letter to President Roosevelt was motivated in part by the fear that Nazi Germany might develop the bomb first. Yet, he went on to call that letter “the one great mistake in my life.”
Far from endorsing American nuclear supremacy, Einstein spent his final years advocating for global disarmament and international control of atomic energy. He feared the arms race and the moral consequences of nuclear warfare, regardless of who held the weapons.
Understanding Einstein’s evolving position is essential — not just to set the historical record straight, but to remind ourselves of the humility and moral reckoning that should accompany any discussion of nuclear weapons.
Chih-Pei Chang
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
Dirk, I think it would be advisable to the State of Israel to actually JOIN the Non-proliferation Treaty themselves instead of deciding on their own who's good and who's bad, so to speak. Iran actually DID join the treaty and was attacked anyway, by duplicitous means (two Pearl Harbor styled actions). Who gets to decide? Why not the UN Security Council and not just one or two self-appointed 'SHERIFFS"?
Mike - you make excellent points. The difference is that the two SHERIFFS, in their capacity of being heads of state, have been threatened with death for years by the Iranian leadership. The UN and its Security Council have been totally inept at curtailing those threats. The Iranian regime has been violating the provisions of every and each treaty, specifically regarding their nuclear program activity. I am not a fan of Netanyahu and his regime either but I do trust ours, even if there were an ulterior motive to send Iran a clear message. It seems to be working out, so far.
Mr./Ms. Chang - "but to remind ourselves of the humility and moral reckoning that should accompany any discussion of nuclear weapons". Isn't that exactly what our Presidents have done since 1945? The last obliteration in Iran happened because humility and morality were completely absent in Tehran. We have not had a nuclear bomb strike since 1945. Einstein was rightly concerned about nuclear proliferation and based on observations during my life since 1943, world leaders have shown constraint or took preventative action to keep some Middle East rogue potentates from acquiring these weapons. With all due respect, Einstein did not suggest an alternative to ending the war against Japan; he was safely ensconced at Princeton.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.