Editor,
During the Board of Supervisors meeting, Supervisor Jackie Speier endorsed California’s Proposition 50 by dramatically warning:
Editor,
During the Board of Supervisors meeting, Supervisor Jackie Speier endorsed California’s Proposition 50 by dramatically warning:
“This is disaster mitigation. It was James Madison in Federalist 47 that said the accumulation of all powers — legislative, executive and judiciary — in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, may justly be the very definition of tyranny. What we are doing here is preventing tyranny.”
Interestingly, the Daily Journal article on Prop. 50 quoted her opening and closing lines but conveniently left out the Madison part — probably because it exposes her hypocrisy.
In the California Legislature, Democrats hold a supermajority, routinely shut out Republican legislators from speaking, and rush bills through without debate. But sure, tell us more about preventing tyranny. If “the accumulation of all powers … in the same hands” is tyranny, as Madison warned, California is Exhibit A. But apparently, “tyranny” only exists when Republicans win elections. When Democrats control everything, it’s just good governance.
This from the same Jackie Speier who posted on X that she’s “having a hard time coming to grips with the assassination” of Charlie Kirk and that it’s “so reprehensible.”
She’s right, political violence is reprehensible. Which is why maybe she should stop tossing around the word “tyranny” every time she does not get her way. If Jackie Speier wants to fight tyranny, she could start by looking in the mirror.
Grace Xuereb
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
Thanks for your letter, Ms. Xuereb, in calling out the hypocrisy of Supervisor Jackie Speier (and everyone else) who is attempting to irrationally rationalize their support for the threat to democracy known as Proposition 50. As I’ve said in the past, their positions on Proposition 50 show us the depth of their moral compasses. It is amazing that these same Democrats have become the party of supporting and defending criminals and terrorists so is it any surprise that these folks would go along with wannabe dictator Newsom in putting party over people? Not at all. Let’s not forget their treachery when we vote in the future. BTW, we now see many Democrats celebrating a political assassination and going further left than the folks on The View. Imagine that, being further left than the folks on The View.
So, Grace, you think what the Democrats in California are doing with Prop 50 is tyranny. May I also assume you believe what the Republican majority in the Texas legislature did was also tyranny? Both states are doing the same thing, except in Texas the legislature did not put it to a public vote, as is being done here. What both states (and now others) are doing is allowed under the U.S. Constitution, but we all know why Texas started this.
Nice try, Rscollins, but a fail. Everyone (even the ones who’d like to conveniently forget) knows there is a difference between Newsom’s antics and Texas’s redistricting. Texas lawmakers are pursuing new congressional maps following a directive from the DOJ asserting that current maps violate civil rights laws. There’s no such directive to California. But now that wannabe dictator Newsom has started a redistricting war, I believe Missouri is attempting to finalize their efforts to replace a Democrat seat with a Republican one. We can only hope all red states will retaliate against California’s retaliation.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.